|
Docudharma Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:45:43 +0200 cross posted from The Dream Antilles
It's been more than 65 years. But the slogan of the RNC and of the McCain Candidacy, "Country First" consciously evokes a slogan from America's recent, right wing, isolationist, antisemitic past, "America First." It's troubling, and it's not an accident. The Republicans might appear at first to be tone deaf. Or maybe they don't recall history. But I doubt it. The phrase "Country First", echoing "America First", is a blatant signal to the far right, the very same people to whom the Republicans offered the Palin nomination, that a McCain candidacy shares their extremist ideological goals. Join me over the jump. You will recall Lindbergh's famous, solo flight across the Atlantic. You might not recall that in 1938 Luftwaffe chief Herman Goering presented Lindbergh with a medal in behalf of Adolf Hitler. Following Kristallnacht, Lindbergh sparked enormous controversy by refusing to return that medal. Lindbergh declined to return the medal, later writing (according to A. Scott Berg) "It seems to me that the returning of decorations, which were given in times of peace and as a gesture of friendship, can have no constructive effect. If I were to return the German medal, it seems to me that it would be an unnecessary insult. Even if war develops between us, I can see no gain in indulging in a spitting contest before that war begins." Two years later, Lindbergh, who still had the medal, remained a spokesman for AFC:
On June 20, 1940 Lindbergh spoke to a rally in Los Angeles billed as "Peace and Preparedness Mass Meeting". In his speech of that day, Lindbergh criticized those movements he perceived as leading America into the war. He proclaimed that the United States was in a position that made it virtually impregnable and he pointed out that when interventionists said "the defense of England" they really meant "defeat of Germany." Lindbergh's presence at the Hollywood Bowl rally was overshadowed, however, by the presence of fringe elements in the crowd. For a full text of the Des Moines speech, go here. To hear it, go here. And who were the fringe elements in the crowd in Hollywood? Newspaper headlines before the speech announced, "L.A. NAZI'S PREPARE FOR LINDBERGH RALLY." And it has been widely written that in addition to the Nazis, Lindbergh shared many followers with Father Coughlin. Later, Lindbergh was on the defensive, claiming that he wasn't really an anti-semite. And the bombing of Pearl Harbor forced the end of the AFC and its arguments for "neutrality." That's the relevant history. The RNC's use of the phrase "Country First" clearly echoes the phrase "America First." Both are extreme. Both seek to imply that those who disagree are, if not outright traitors, unacceptably less patriotic, and that those who disagree find primacy instead in foreign, alien, liberal values, values that are unpatriotic, instead of American. This isn't a dog whistle only the right can hear. As buhdy pointed out in a comment recently, this is a bull horn. And it's typical, old time, right wing Republican politics. This isn't about change, it's about atavism. And then there's this:
Sun, 07 Sep 2008 04:28:26 +0200 I recently participated in the overly burdened multi-stage process that my place of employment uses for hiring. We were looking for a new manager for one of our Hem-Onc units, we have a relatively democratic atmosphere. Case in point, while doing rounds last night in the middle of total chaos the new fellow introduces himself to me and says so you're my Leukemia expert and I said," No that would be you." He laughed and sad ,"Well X informs me you're going to keep me from making mistakes while I am new." Because, well, he is right. I will. I supervise the RNs but I also have to shepherd the new docs who know far more than me. I have plenty of experience doing this: dealing with people far smarter than I. If somebody asked me to put a one liner on my resume that would be it: I can recognize when somebody is smarter than me and in my workplace I am surrounded by them. It happens in a research institution.
We had five candidates and the one I favored is very young, inexperienced and male, still a big minority in nursing. My belief was that if we did not hire him another institution was going to snap him up and apparently for once in my career I was on the same side as the big dogs who decided to he was the right choice. His big negative was a lack of experience. And we are already talking about experience in this charmingly obtuse political season. Who has it. Who doesn't. What kind of "experience" do we want? Think about how many big steps in life we take with no experience. The first time you get married, have your first child, drive a car, go on a date. Think about all the incredibly bad advice you got from those so called "experienced" people. Sure I am guilty of playing the middled aged "experience" card myself when I doll out my advice and I am just as often wrong. The only relevant experience for being president is being president. Of course it ends up that I am defending the choice of Palin by saying this and actually her lack of experience doesn't bother me: it is the crazy packaged as middle America that irks me. That is the genius of American cultural hegemony. It is so broad and vague that almost anybody can be made to seem just like you and I when they aren't. We are taking a chance on a new manager at my workplace. I don't know what change he is bringing but I just coherent enough to know change is coming and I can either rely on my old patterns of thinking and risk becoming professionally irrelevant or learn to surf in the new ocean. People often say that change for the sake of change isn't necessarily better but nor is it necessarily worse. What good is experience if it is just used to enforce an existing and decaying order? What good are leadership skills it they are merely a repetition of worn out tunes? Most leadership skills are acquired when one becomes one anyway. Of course I have had plenty of leadership training at my work place but it happened long after I took my position and after I basically asked for it. Experience in politics, at work, and in life is only a useful tool if one actually decides to learn from it, to admit mistakes and formulate new approaches. Otherwise claiming credibility because one is experienced is the equivalent of saying I am entitled to lead because I ain't dead yet. Sun, 07 Sep 2008 03:04:30 +0200 A musical celebration of John McCain's disregard for the intellectual property of others.
"In light of Jackson Browne's lifelong commitment to Democratic ideals and political candidates, the misappropriation of Jackson Browne's endorsement is entirely reprehensible, and I have no doubt that a jury will agree." (h/t:Scribb for saving me from linkscrounging) "Sarah Palin's views and values in NO WAY represent us as American women. We ask that our song 'Barracuda' no longer be used to promote her image. The song 'Barracuda' was written in the late 70s as a scathing rant against the soulless, corporate nature of the music business, particularly for women. (The 'barracuda' represented the business.) While Heart did not and would not authorize the use of their song at the RNC, there's irony in Republican strategists' choice to make use of it there." "This is yet another example of John McCain not learning anything from George Bush's mistakes," (Rep. John) Hall (D-NY and Orleans) wrote First Read in an interview over e-mail. "First, McCain adopted Bush's failed policy of an open-ended war in Iraq, then he wrapped his arms around the failed Bush economic policies that have put the squeeze on middle class families. Now, he's making the same mistake George Bush made illegally using a copyrighted song without asking either the writers or the performers for permission...(w)hat is at issue here is Senator McCain's use of the song to try and advance an agenda that I do not support without respecting copyright law and intellectual property," (AP) It may be "Our Country," but it's John Mellencamp's song. As the good folks at Wired magazine report, the McCain campaign failed to license Valli's hits--a pricey but, alas, necessary move--and the Warner Music Group asserted its copyright claim against YouTube, eventuating the takedown. Wired notes that "it's ironic that a United States senator, who has been part of a body that has so repudiated the idea of fair-use, is feeling the repeated stings resulting from its own legislative history." But we here at Stumper headquarters think that the more interesting--and/or hilarious--story is McCain's utter inability to find a single rock star willing to associate his or her songs with the campaign. John McCain ended the big rally introducing Sarah Palin as his running mate with the Van Halen song "Right Now," and the band is not pleased, reports TMZ: Browne's lawyer Lawrence Iser says this ain't the first time McCain has done this -- he did it with ABBA's "Take a Chance on Me" and well-known Democrat John Mellencamp's song "Pink Houses." Sun, 07 Sep 2008 02:27:49 +0200 Crossposted from ePluribus Media; please read the DailyKos diary cited below.. Thank you.
I've got the opening excerpted after the jump.
Read the whole thing. What it amounts to is an attempt to further restrict choices and options for women everywhere with regard to the availability of birth control information, medicine, medical services and related health issues. It further impacts the capacity of women to make a choice regarding abortion, as well as permits healthcare providers and insurance carriers -- and a host of others -- to deny service and tell the patient to seek help elsewhere, without having to provide a recommendation or referral. It's another attempt to subvert a woman's right to choose and her capacity to control her own body and life, and it's insidious in nature. According to the diary update, "Junkyard Dem has added a link to Digg." Digg it. Alert others. Spread the word and stop this obscenity before it becomes the new standard and means to further restrict and control the rights of women in our society. Sat, 06 Sep 2008 07:06:53 +0200 Since no one over at the main Kos site seems to care about anything other than Palin, here's a cross post...
For those interested in the Native Americans of Southern LA, I'll post on that tomorrow...however, this is another issue that burns me up, so here's the rant on this... It's a complex issue, but I'll try to make it short and bittersweet. Mental health issues are not treated like physical health issues by insurance companies. Despite the fact that neuroscience has now clearly linked many mental health disorders like depression, bipolar disorder, PTSD, ADHD, etc. to genetic issues or chemical imbalances, these are still considered conditions that do not merit the same level of coverage as physical health issues like cancer. Why? Because it would cost more money...the helath insurers generally treat these as they did in the 1970's, offering limited..if any...coverage. You can go to the National Institute of Mental Health website for the stats..I won't bore anyone with them here. However, they indicate that 13 million Americans have some form of debilitating mental health issue and nearly 60 million have a mental health issue of any form. As with other forms of health care, minorities and the poor suffer more fro m these issues--often due to a lack of care--than other population groups. Further, this should not be a Red or Blue issue, as anyone, from any background can develop a disorder. For example, I have a good friend who developed schizophrenia while in college. He was from a well-off family, had attended a very good private college prep school and was enrolled in one of the top universities. He started developing symptoms in his sophomore year. He dropped out, and fell into a spiral that eventually found him homeless or in jail. He was eventually able to get help, and now lives a precarious, though stable, life on disability. He is one of the lucky ones, as he had family and friends who gave a shit. Others aren't so lucky in their support. A much more comprehensive measure passed the House this year, sponsored by Patrick J. Kennedy. However, the Senate has stalled the legislation over partisan (i.e., GOP) concerns that this would put an undue burden on "small" business owners and would cause a raise in taxes. So, where have the candidates been on this? Obama was part of the effort in Illinois. According to the Chicago Sun Times,
From his website: "Under the Obama plan, private insurance offered by employers and both the private and public insurance plans will include coverage of all essential medical services, including mental health care. Obama is a strong supporter of mental health parity and he believes that serious mental illnesses must be covered on the same terms and conditions as are applicable to physical illnesses and diseases. He does not think health insurance companies should be allowed to discriminate against the mentally ill." As for Biden, he was a cosponsor of the Wellstone act and has this to say: Even though mental disorders are widespread in the population, mental disorders and people suffering from them face great stigmatism and discrimination. We must work to reduce the stigma attached to mental illness, and to create opportunities for people to seek help and treatment for their illness. I believe in investing in research for new methods of prevention and treatment, and working to make sure these innovations are available to patients by guaranteeing that insurance providers must provide full parity for mental health treatment. I was a co-sponsor of the Paul Wellstone Mental Health Equitable Treatment Act and I remain committed to the goals of the act as a cosponsor of the Mental Health Parity Act of 2007 in this Congress. In addition, I have fought to make sure that Medicare patients pay the same co-payments and deductibles for a mental health issue as they would for a physical injury. He further promised (at that time running for president) that he would promote mental health parity through new legislation. McCain has voted against mental health parity and, in his health care "plan" on his website makes no mention of mental health as an issue. I haven't been able to find anything on Palin--no surprise there... In a statement made in response to a questionnaire from the National Alliance for Mental Health (the questionnaire was unanswered, McCain's campaign said this: The next President will face a great challenge due to the rising cost of health care of all types. America has the finest doctors and medical science, and the treatment of mental health has shared in these advances. However, as with other aspects of our health care system, spending on mental and behavioral health treatments is rising rapidly. The challenge is to ensure high quality care, establish incentives to control the growth of costs, and thereby permit greater affordable choices. Most of this is bullshit when dealing with mental health issues. The choice is very clear if one cares about this issue. Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:12:54 +0200 The data just keep pouring in (quite literally,) on ice-melting around the world.
Most people have focused their attention on Arctic sea-ice melt, but the heating of the water and the air that is driving the breakup of Arctic ice shelves is also taking down all of the regions ice sheets as well. Similarly, increased melt rates have been noted in Greenland and Antarctica, while mountain glaciers are also losing mass at unprecedented rates. See chart below: There can be no doubt that we are now past the tipping point for ice melt worldwide. The chart below shows sea ice melt rates by month and sea in 2008. Sea ice extent on September 4, 2008 compared with... Sea ice extent on September 4, 2007, the current record year. MSNBC has reported on the collapse of the ice shelves: Derek Mueller, an Arctic ice shelf specialist at Trent University in Ontario, told The Associated Press that the 4,500-year-old Markham Ice Shelf separated in early August and the 19-square-mile shelf is now adrift in the Arctic Ocean. The peak temperature the team recorded was 67.5 degrees Fahrenheit (19.7 degrees Celsius), far above the average of 46 degrees Fahrenheit. This NASA Earth Observatory image identifies each of the 5 remaining Canadian ice shelves on Ellesmere island and shows their breakup over a 5 week period. According to Dr. Warwick Vincent of Laval University:
Markham ice sheet overview from Environment Canada Mueller also said that two large sections of ice detached from the Serson Ice Shelf, shrinking that ice feature by 47 square miles - or 60 percent - and that the Ward Hunt Ice Shelf has also continued to break up, losing an additional eight square miles. July-August, 2008 MODIS image from the Rapid Response Project at NASA/GSFC. Animation courtesy Derek Mueller, Trent University. This comes on the heels of unusual cracks in a northern Greenland glacier, rapid melting of a southern Greenland glacier, and a near record loss for Arctic sea ice this summer. And earlier this year a 160-square mile chunk of an Antarctic ice shelf disintegrated. Wilkins ice sheet collapsing. Courtesy of European Space Agency. The CBC also reported on the ice shelves' collapse: The ice shelves on the north coast of Ellesmere lost 214 square kilometres over the summer, or an area three times larger than Manhattan Island, said a group of researchers from Ontario, Quebec and the United States on Tuesday. This means that Quttinirpaaq National Park, Canada's most northerly, may soon lose its last remaining ice shelf after the loss of its other ice shelf, the Markham, this summer. Only recently named for a respected Arctic scientist, Harold Serson, the Serson Ice Shelf dammed a 76 km2 freshwater lake measuring approximately four meters deep that sits atop the sea water. The loss of this rare ecosystem is a possibility since it is dependent on the ice shelf staying intact. Dr. Warwick Vincent, Director of Laval University's Centre for Northern Studies and a researcher in the program ArcticNet, has been studying the ecology of northern Ellesmere Island for more than ten years. He has just returned from his latest expedition to the area, where he observed dramatic changes along the coast. "These ice shelves are formed from the Arctic's thickest and oldest marine ice" he says, "and the extent of their loss this season is significant. Unique ecosystems that depend on this ice are on the brink of extinction." The Northwest Passage is now open in two places: The above image is from August 8, 2008 when only Amundsen's Route was open. Envisat ASAR mosaic from mid-August 2008 showing an almost ice-free Northwest Passage. The direct route through the Northwest Passage is highlighted in the picture by an orange line. The orange dotted line shows the indirect route, called the Amundsen Northwest Passage, which has been passable for almost a month. Two centuries of fossil fuel consumption have brought us to this: melting ice, species extinction, depleted water supplies, and rising sea levels. For much of humanity, however, it does not seem to have brought any insight. Does anyone besides me find these images from last week's Republican National Convention terrifyingly reminiscent of the Two Minutes Hate in George Orwell's 1984? Only now the hatred is directed against the entire planet and everyone who wishes to live sustainably upon it.
Crossposted at Climaticide Chronicles Sat, 06 Sep 2008 22:39:43 +0200 Weekend News Digest is an Open Thread
1 Questions remain on Palin vetting
2 Democrats post big gains in voter registration By JULIE PACE and STEPHEN OHLEMACHER, Associated Press Writers 2 hours, 16 minutes ago
3 Obama hits McCain on Social Security
4 Spacecraft flies by remote asteroid, camera stops
5 Boeing machinists strike
6 Zardari wins Pakistan election
7 Turkish president pays historic visit to Armenia
8 US-Russia tensions deepen over Georgia
9 As Gustav evacuees return to New Orleans, a varied homecoming
10 Reported U.S. attack upsets Pakistan
11 This round, Pentagon may keep General Petraeus offstage
12 Iraq's anti-Qaeda fighters fear for their future
13 Silver State Bank in Nevada is shut
14 McCain's backdrop baffles California school
15 Rep. Frank: gov't will stabilize Fannie, Freddie
16 Blast, clashes in northwest Pakistan kills 54
17 Russia accuses West of provocation in Georgia
18 Voting in Angola election resumes amid controversy
19 Growing Apathy Toward Iraqi Elections
20 Can Soccer Heal Turkey-Armenia Rift?
21 Russian Aid Pours into South Ossetia
22 How Fast Should Iraq Re-Arm?
23 Mackie Green: Canada's premier whale rescuer
24 FBI's civil rights initiative: no trials yet
25 Obama, McCain to appear at Ground Zero on 9/11
26 Home foreclosures reach record high
27 Rise in unemployment shifts election debate
28 Mike Huckabee: Still a GOP Star
29 Are Evangelicals Really Sold on Palin?
30 Palin: More and less than she seems
31 EU gambles on next U.S. president, result secret
32 Nuclear nations approve disputed India trade waiver
33 Bush, Singh welcome approval of nuclear deal
34 Cheney rallies NATO to ward off Russian power grab
35 Talking points trump straight talk at GOP convention
36 Report: Nomura considering stake in Lehman
37 Unemployment climbs to 5-year high of 6.1 percent
38 Fannie, Freddie's boards meet Saturday to mull government plan
39 GE gets "Wells notice" in SEC accounting probe
40 Swedish fund pressuring Daimler to hive off trucks: report
41 'Fruitful' talks but no deal to save India's cheap-car plant
42 Feds warn climate change could harm giant sequoias
43 Oldest gorilla in captivity dies in Dallas at 55
44 Raising vegetables under Canada's midnight sun
45 European space probe sees 'diamond in the sky'
46 Despite Glitch, European Spacecraft's Asteroid Flyby a Success
47 Storms Delay Shuttle Missions to Hubble, Space Station
48 Autism and Vaccines: Why Bad Logic Trumps Science
49 Extinction Circles Giant Vultures
50 Urban Surprise: More Bicyclists Means Fewer Accidents
51 How Hot Is the Yellowstone Hotspot?
Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:18:20 +0200 If you make over 5 million a year, you choice is clear, Vote Republican!
If your children are over draft age, Vote Republican! If you think the REAL elites will let you in their club someday, Vote Republican! If you like bailing out Wall St. with your tax dollars, Vote Republican! If you fear that whites are losing ground, Vote Republican If you don't care if we kill some foreigners to get more oil, Vote Republican! If you think America should rule the world, Vote Republican! If you think black people are uppity, Vote Republican! If your SUV is important enough to justify torture, Vote Republican! If you can't make decisions regarding your own uterus, Vote Republican! If you like $4 a gallon gas, Vote Republican! If you think Sith Lords are just misunderstood......
Vote Republican! If you like learning geography through invading new exciting countries, Vote Republican! If you think having money means being favored by God, Vote Republican! If you think Muslims will invade America, Vote Republican! If you think healthcare is for the rich, Vote Republican! If you think Veterans are coddled, Vote Republican! If you like being spied on by your government, Vote Republican! If you like inflation and unemployment, Vote Republican! If you think security is more important than liberty, Vote Republican! If poor people deserve to be poor, Vote Republican! If you think George Bush is a good president, Vote Republican! If you hate Polar Bears, Vote Republican! If you think marijuana is the devils weed, Vote Republican! If you are afraid that terrorists will attack Kansas, Vote Republican! If you like buying foreclosed houses cheap, Vote Republican! If you like unplanned teenage pregnancies, Vote Republican! If you think abstinence only works, Vote Republican! If skin color darker than pale makes you clutch your purse, Vote Republican! If you're afraid you might commit sodomy if it isn't illegal, Vote Republican! If it doesn't bother you that 12% of Americans live below the poverty line, Vote Republican! If you hate unions, Vote Republican! If you like bank failures, Vote Republican! If you think hurricanes are caused by parades, Vote Republican! If Dick Cheney strikes you as a nice guy, Vote Republican! If corporations are more important than people, Vote Republican! If having THREE economic classes is one too many, Vote Republican! If you think the planet is 6000 years old, Vote Republican! If you like government corruption, Vote Republican! If you think middle schools are veterans hospitals, Vote Republican! If you don't own a house on the rising coastline, Vote Republican! If you are an aficionado of clever lying and spin, Vote Republican! If you think you may 'catch teh gay,' Vote Republican! If science scares you, Vote Republican! If you are worried that we might lose the world lead in incarceration, Vote Republican! If you think having a habitable planet is not important, Vote Republican! If world peace is overrated, Vote Republican! If you think 'do unto others' is a con job, Vote Republican! Sat, 06 Sep 2008 20:13:26 +0200
In short, McCain and his Republican tacticians think that the American people should shut up and be happy with whatever happy talk the campaign wishes to engage in via staged rallies and campaign ads. That is almost exactly what McCain spokesperson Nicolle Wallace told Jay Carney of Time Magazine. I created the Palin Watch widget to record the elapsed time from her entry into the race, until she agrees to answer questions in a fair, independent, national media forum. There is simply no other way to assess her ability to perform the job she seeks. A candid give and take with probing journalists reveals more of a candidates knowledge and insight than a speech that was probably prepared by aides. The job she wants is far too important to give to an unknown quantity who arrogantly declines to open herself up to the people she would serve. The Palin Watch was inspired in part by the Obama Watch, a device that Chris Wallace used to goad Barack Obama into appearing on his Fox News Sunday program. The difference is that I am not pimping my own show, or any show, so long as Palin makes herself available to press scrutiny. Americans must rise up and demand that McCain free Sarah Palin. The time is now to come clean so that voters have sufficient information to make an informed judgment. Democracy is in a sorry state if political strategists can hawk candidates like soda pop without ever disclosing the ingredients. Fri, 05 Sep 2008 20:35:40 +0200 The McCain campaign and Republican Party have both been aggressive in their use of music, clips from movies, etc without, it seems, even bothering to seek copyright permission despite the promise "to protect the creative industires from privacy." They have gotten pushback, multiple times, for their unauthorized use (read "theft") of intellectual property. In many of these cases, the involved artists are actually quite Green and environmentalist in their donation streams and stated interests.
A Daily Kos diary highlights Heart's (Wilson sisters) reaction to the use of Barracuda as a theme song for Sarah "Pit Bull with Lipstick" Palin. This abuse of Heart's property rights is not, however, an isolated case. Singer Jackson Browne is suing the McCain campaign McCain campaign re-cut a web ad after comedian Mike Myers' publicist complained about the use of footage of Myers and fellow Saturday Night Live alum Dana Carvey's Wayne's World characters The McCain campaign had to pull and re-cut a web ad after Frankie Valli's record label, the Warner Music Group asserted its copyright claims over the use of the song "Can't Take My Eyes Off Of You." Earlier this year, the copyright owners for the "Rocky" theme song "telephoned the McCain campaign to politely complain it was being used without permission." As noted,
Ironically, McCain has joked on the campaign trail that he has refrained from using music by his beloved ABBA because of "licensing and other concerns." "If you're not careful you can alienate some Swedes," said McCain. Even though this has received some visibility and lawsuits are evidently underway, the problems are not ending. For example, the RNC used Heart's "Barracuda" as a theme song for Sarah "Pit Bull with Lipstick" Palin.
The musicians objected to this unauthorized use of their property and requested that the Republican Party stop using Barracuda (or other Heart music).
We have asked the Republican campaign publicly not to use our music. We hope our wishes will be honored. Heart's request evidently had a powerful impact on the RNC and McCain campaign. Twenty minutes after that post hit the web, "the GOP ended the evening after McCain's speech with the song, "Barracuda."" "The Republican campaign did not ask for permission to use the song, nor would they have been granted that permission." Not just about the theft of property rights This is not simply a question of "property rights" and intellectual property, although that is clearly on the table. There is also the question of seeming political endorsement. Many of these artists are significant environmental concerns. As to Heart, for example,
Nancy Wilson: In the interim between the last Heart studio album and since The Road Home, we worked a lot on environmental causes. We did quite a few benefits, played for Al Gore and Hillary Clinton, and Bill Clinton as well. So we did a lot of benefits, stuff for old growth, a lot of wildlife causes. Hmmm ... does this seem like a record that would embrace the McCain-Palin ticket? The McCain-Palin ticket is far from Green (to the extent it is green, it is awash with green from fossil-fuel contributors). And, at least some of these artists are far from R in their politics. And, these artists are challenging what is going on. Re Jackson Browne,
Singer and songwriter Jackson Browne is not amused that his song "Running On Empty" has been used in a television commercial for John McCain and against Barack Obama. This is a broad-side of legal complaints against the RNC and ORP. It is hard, from this layman's perspective, to see their substantive defense to this complaint.
But why is Browne so outraged? Browne's complaint asserts that he has had a "legacy as an advocate for social and environmental justice" and that he has "closely associated himself with liberal causes and Democratic political candidates." There is, for Browne, a clear attempt to take his property and his stature to use in support of anti-environmental causes: namely the McCain for President campaign. Imagine ... Could you imagine a press conference with a number of artists who have had the Republican Party illegally using their intellectual property? Imagine a press conference where these varied artists speak strongly of the need to confront global warming, develop a cleaner energy future, and other environmental challenges. Imagine that at the press conference, they speak out against the McCain campaign's and RNC's disdain for private property rights. Imagine that they use these as clear examples of why they so strongly support Barack Obama for President, because of McCain/Palin's disdain for environmental issues, private property rights, and other fundamental American values. Imagine ... Sat, 06 Sep 2008 12:41:29 +0200 It's no wonder the 109th GOP Congress and Administration, in their rush to War with the Drums beating Louder and Louder, didn't take Military Care and once again the Veterans Care, Wars Makes, into consideration and Pass Legislation and Funding, They Couldn't Find The Facilities, and still can't!! John McCain may not be able to find the right Walter Reed, but we sure can. Watch this new video from Americans United for Change.
*** Media Advisory for Saturday, September 6th @ 11AM EDT at Walter Reed Army Medical Center *** IRAQ WAR VETERANS TO HOLD PRESS CONFERENCE OUTSIDE OF WALTER REED TO REMIND JOHN MCCAIN WHERE IT IS, CALL MCCAIN OUT FOR TURNING HIS BACK ON AMERICA'S VETERANS |