SHEOL, HADES & GEHENNAtitled THE UNDERWORLDby EJ Hill & Friends, Private Bag X15, Suite 25, Hermanus, 7200 Gen. 37v35, 42v37-38, 44v29-31; Num. 16v30-33; Deut. 32v17-22; 1 Sam. 2v6; 2 Sam. 22v4-6; 1 Kgs. 2v5-6, v8-9; Job 7v9-10, 11v7-9, 14v11-14, 17v11-14, v16, 21v7-15, 24v19, 26v6-7; Ps. 6v5, 16v9-10, 18v4-6, 30v3, 31v17, 37v2, v9-10, v20, v22, v28, v34, v38, 49v12-15, 55v15, 86v13, 88v1-3, 89v48, 116v3-4, 139v8, 141v7; Pr. 1v10-12, 5v3-5, 7v27, 9v16-18, 15v11, v24, 23v13-14, 27v20, 30v15-16; Ecc. 9v10, 12v7; Sos. 8v6; Is. 5v13-14, 14v9, v11, v15, 26v19, 28v15, v18, 38v10, v18, 57v9; Ez. 31v15-17, 32v21, v27; Dan. 12v2; Hos. 13v14; Am. 9v2; Jon. 2v1-2; Hab. 2v5; Mal. 4v1-2; Mt. 3v10, v12, 10v28, 12v41-42, 13v24-30, v36-51, 22v13, 25v30, v41, v46; Mk. 6v11, 9v48; Lk. 10v14, 11v31-32, 16v19-31, 23v39-43; Jn. 3v13, v16, 6v40, 11v24; Acts 2v25-27, v34, 5v9, 24v15, 26v18; Rom. 2v7, 6v23, 14v10; 1 Cor. 3v17, 5v5, 7v5, 15v35-55; 2 Cor. 2v11, 5v10, 11v14, 12v2-4, v7; Ph. 1v23, v28, 3v19; 1 Th. 2v18, 4v16-17; 2 Th. 1v9, 2v9; 1 Tim. 1v20, 5v15, 6v16; 2 Tim. 1v10, 2v18; Heb. 6v2, 9v27; Js. 1v15; 2 Pt. 1v4, 2v1, v3-4, v6, v9, v12, 3v6-7; 1 Jn. 5v16; Jude 1v6-7; Rev. 2v11, 7v15, 12v9, 14v10-11; 17v8, v11, 19v10, 20v5-6, v10, v14-15, 21v8 INTRODUCTIONPlato's HadesEnglish dictionaries equate hell with hades as “a nether world in which the dead continue to exist” The concept of hell which has passed down through the ages is largely influenced by the ancient Greek belief in hades – believed to be a place of fiery torment inhabited and controlled by demonic forces. It has been suggested that the Hellenistic influences of Greek culture played a large part in the early Church's development of doctrine, and that the Greek concept of hades took root where no parallel scriptural concept exists. Is this where the Roman Catholic Church got its concept of hell and passed it on to succeeding generations? Or is there a biblical concept that does parallel that of hades? If not, why did the writers of the New Testament use the Greek word hades to describe the nether world of which they wrote? These questions cannot be answered in a flimsy little tract as some have attempted. It takes an exhaustive search and study of Scripture. This, in turn, requires an honest appraisal of the various Hebrew and Greek words translated “hell” in both the Old and New Testament. THE OLD TESTAMENT "SHEOL"The only HEBREW word often translated as “hell” in the OLD TESTAMENT is “sheol”, which are also translated “grave”, “pit”, and “it” {H7585}. Since “hell”, “grave”, and “pit” are different things, the question arises as to why the same word were translated differently. By Hebrew understanding, “sheol” is the name of the underworld, or the place where departed spirits await the resurrection. Is Sheol the Grave?Jacob, when confronted with the false news of his son's death, lamented:
In the same way, when Jacob's sons returned from Egypt telling him that Pharoah's chief had demanded that they bring Benjamin to him, Jacob referred to “sheol.” He spoke of his fear of dying in sorrow should anything evil befall Benjamin:
In Genesis chapter 44 verses 29 to 31 Judah reiterates this fear to Joseph, in saying:
TRANSLITERATION If “sheol” is not the grave, why did Bible translators often render it as such? Considering the idea of hell as a place of eternal torment where the wicked suffered at the hands of demonic beings, it would have been incorrect for them to assign the righteous there. The translators therefore considered the Hebrew authors to be in error; they must have meant the grave, not “hell.” It is exactly here that mythology slipped in to overthrow proper exegesis. Religious leaders are often infected with tradition; in due time when they find something in Scripture that conflicts with that tradition they attempt to make things “right” by assigning their well-intentioned but erroneous understanding of the problem. LAZARUS & THE RICH MAN Jesus, in relating the story of the beggar Lazarus and the rich man (Lk. 16v19-31), revealed that the underworld (at least at that time) consisted of two compartments: one in which the righteous were held “in comfort” (v25), awaiting the resurrection to eternal life, and another in which the unrighteous were held “in torment” (v23-25), awaiting their resurrection to judgment (2 Pt. 2v4). That said, if we consider that “sheol” is the place where both, the righteous (Gen. 37v35, 42v37-38, 44v29-31) and the unrighteous (1 Kgs. 2V5-9), went to await resurrection, we see that Jacob was speaking of the underworld, not the grave. He did not say that he would live in “sheol” in sorrow, but that he would go down into “sheol” mourning his son. If we should consistently translate “sheol” (sometimes translated as “the grave”, other times as “hell” and also “the pit”) we would do well, in retaining either the Hebrew “sheol”, or English “underworld”. This would have avoided much confusion.
These are just a few examples where “sheol” have been translated as “the grave”. Yet, the very same verses could just as easily have been translated as “hell”, consistent with the rest. There is no description of “sheol” in 1 Sam. 2v6, or 1 Kgs. 2V5-9, or Job 7v9-10 or Job 14v12-13 that conclusively require them to be translated as “the grave”. Sheol cannot mean both the underworld and the grave. There exists another Hebrew word properly translated as “the grave”. That word is “qeber”, which occurs 67 times and, with few exceptions, refers specifically to the grave, tomb or sepulcher. Most correctly, “sheol” translates to the underworld (place of departed spirits), and “qeber” the grave. Nowhere in the Old Testament is references made to an eternal, fiery state or place. Even though, the King James translators did use the term “hell” for “sheol” in several instances, none of those instances describe “hell” as it has come to be known in English usage. Is Sheol a Place of Consciousness?Please refer to "The State of The Dead" by EJ Hill. Is Sheol a Place of Torment?When looking at the OLD TESTAMENT instances where “sheol” are being translated as “hell”, we will see that it describes a place of consciousness and sorrow. But does the Old Testament say anything about “sheol” being a place of fiery torment? Sorrow Regardless of whether “sheol” is rendered “hell” or “the grave,” no single instance describes “hell” or what transpires there other than sorrow. When David was delivered from the hand of Saul, he sings:
Pain There is also only one instance where pain is mentioned:
While the psalmist acknowledges pain in “sheol” he does not reveal the degree or duration of that pain. Nor does he say how that pain is inflicted, whether by fire, demonic forces, or any other means. Worm The prophet Isaiah says of the king of Babylon in “sheol”:
Fire There exists also only two passage of Scripture where “sheol” and fire are mentioned together. In speaking of Israel's idolatry, God said:
Here, we find God's anger being kindled as a fire which will burn not only in “sheol”, but will eventually also consume earth. Even if we should take Deuteronomy chapter 32 verses 17 to 22 as describing fiery torment, it still doesn't describe “sheol” (or hell) as a place of eternal torment to any particular degree.
This is the first OLD TESTAMENT instance where “sheol” are directly linked with “the coals of fire” and “a most vehement flame”, providing at least tentative support to the traditional view of “sheol” as a place of fiery torment. However, this lack of conclusive evidence does not necessarily disown the concept. Lacking any conclusive evidence from the OLD TESTAMENT, we are compelled to move on to the NEW TESTAMENT. THE NEW TESTAMENT HAIDESThere are many references to “hell” in the New Testament. However, once again, we find two words translated as “hell”, causing much confusion. For the sake of clarification, we will have to look at each New Testament reference individually. The first word translated as “hell” in the New Testament is “hades”. “Hades” is the NEW TESTAMENT equivalent to the OLD TESTAMENT “sheol”, taken from the GREEK “helan” (hidden) from which we get the English word “hell”. Instances include Mt. 11v23, 16v18; Lk. 10v15, 16v23; Acts 2v27, v31; Rev. 1v18, 6v8, and 20v13-14. "Haides" Is "Sheol"The synonymy of the Hebrew “sheol” and the Greek “haides” are to be found in an Old Testament prophecy and it's New Testament fulfillment. King David prophesied in song:
We find it's fulfillment in the Book of Acts with reference to Jesus:
Having established therefore that “sheol” and “haides” are the same, we are at liberty to ascribe the former's characteristics to the latter. Therefore “haides” is a place of departed spirits awaiting resurrection. The following are references to “haides” as “hell”.
The Gates of Hell
Understanding that “haides” refer to “sheol”, or the place of departed spirits awaiting resurrection, the Lord was saying that the gates of “haides” or “sheol” would not prevail against His Church; i.e. they will not prevent us from being resurrected to eternal life. (Ps. 16v9-10; Acts 2v25-27) Many have misunderstood Matthew chapter 16 verse 18:- The Roman Catholic Church used it to established their claim of apostolic succession. Some charismaniacs, on the other hand, have attempted to “storm the gates of hell ... tearing them down”. But Christ's words were a prophecy of the resurrection, not a command to attack demons. The idea that demons control hell ("sheol" or "haides") is a fantasy born of Greek mythology. Lazarus and the Rich Man Jesus Himself describes the underworld as a place for both, the righteous and the unrighteous, awaiting final resurrection:
Notice four important things:
The Greek word translated “flame” in Luke chapter 16 verse 24, is phlox {G5395}, which when used apart from pur {G4442} denotes heat. Yet, when used alongside each other, as in 2 Thessalonians chapter 1 verse 8, it indicates “flaming fire”. The fact that the rich man could speak and reason would indicate that the heat is intense, but not so as to annihilate or incapacitate him. It is in this description of Lazarus and the rich man that we learn for the first time that “sheol” or “hades” is, indeed, a place of torment for the lost. Is Hades a place of Torment?Having already established the synonymy of “sheol” and “haides” - it would be safe to conclude that what applies to the one, is also applicable to the other. ----------
---------- It has to be said that even though “hades” is a place of torment, not once is it said to be a place of perishing, destruction, or annihilation. Rather that itself along with its content will be "cast into the lake of fire" (Rev. 20v14) The Harrowing of HaidesWhen Jesus died on the cross He descended into the underworld (sheol or hades). What took place in that period is described to some degree in by the following: Preaching
Some have suggested, due to a misreading of First Peter chapter 3 verses 18 to 20, that while in the underworld ("sheol" or "haides"), the Lord preached to the disobedient in the days of Noah. For a thorough exposition on First Peter chapter 3 verses 18 to 20; see, "Hill's Bible Commentary" on 1 Pt. 3v19. Suffering There is no indication that He suffered while in the underworld. He may just as well have preached to them from “Abraham's Bosom”, as Abraham did to the rich man. The only suffering pertaining to Christ, is that which He suffered “in the flesh” (Heb. 2v18, 9v26, 13v12; 1 Pt. 2v21-23, 3v18, 4v1). Captivity
Amongst theologians there are three views pertaining to Christ leading “captivity captive”.
The problem with this interpretation is that Satan is not yet bound, and therefore still free to deceive and test the hearts of man (Acts 26v18; 1 Cor. 5v5, 7v5; 2 Cor. 2v11, 11v14, 12v7; 1 Th. 2v18; 1 Tim. 1v20, 5v15; Rev. 12v9).
The problem with this interpretation is that the resurrection of the dead will include both, the just and unjust (Acts 24v15), occurring for the first time at the Great White Throne Judgment (Dan. 12v2; Jn. 6v40, 13v36, 14v3; 1 Cor. 15v35-55; 1 Th. 4V13-17; Rev. 20v5-15). Amongst those holding to this view are Albert James Dager from Media Spotlight®. THE NEW TESTAMENT "GEHENNA"There is also a second Greek word translated “hell”, “ghehennah” in the New Testament. Instances include Mt. 5v22, v29-30, 10v28, 18v9, 23v15, v33; Mk. 9v43, v45, v47; Lk. 12v5; and Js. 3v6. The Valley of Hinnom In biblical times, Ghehenah was situated to the south of Jerusalem, in the Valley of Hinnom. It was a place where criminals were buried and where the refuse of Jerusalem were burned. In time, it came to represent the final fate of the lost. It was in this historical context, that Jesus, Matthew, Mark, Luke and James taught. Gehenna Is The Lake of Fire ----------
---------- It is safe to suggest that since both “gehenna” and “the lake of fire” references the Day of Judgment and unquenchable fire, they are one and the same. * While speaking of “unquenchable fire”, both Mt. 3v12 and Lk. 3v17 does not in particularly reference either “gehenna” or “the lake of fire”. Gehenna Not HadesHades being cast into "the lake of fire" (Gehenna):
Is Gehenna a Place of Torment?Damnation
Torment
Destruction
THE HERESIES OF ROMAN CATHOLICISMThe Vicar of ChristTHE POPE is referred to as “Holy Father”, acting on behalf of God. As Mel Gibson once stated, when the Pope speaks from “the chair” it is the voice of God. The Pope also bears the title “Vicar of Christ”. Vicar meaning “substitute”. The Pope claims to be “the substitute of Jesus Christ.” Jesus Christ is the “head of the Church” (Eph. 5v23) - therefore the Catholic Catechism states:
Matthew chapter 23 verse 9 quickly demolishes the “Holy Father” myth, in stating: “And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven.” (KJV, p.433) And Ephesians chapter 5 verse 23 dethrones the Vicar, for “Christ is the head of the Church.” (KJV, p.520) SalvationismThe Roman Catholic church also proclaims SALVATION THROUGH ROMAN CATHOLICISM. Catholics are saved, Protestants are lost. This Catholic-only-salvation-myth are utterly disproved through John chapter 14 verse 6 “Jesus said unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by Me.” And Acts chapter 4 verse 12 “Neither is their salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, where by we must be saved.” TransubstantiationThe RCC teaches that salvation is in THE MASS OR HOLY EUCHARIST. In the Eucharist, through a mystic process called transubstantiation the bread is believed to literally change into the actual Body of Jesus Christ and the blood literally changed into the Blood of Christ. Without partaking of the Catholic Mass, there is no salvation. Not surprisingly then, that Gibson and Caviezel (the actor that played Jesus in The Passion of The Christ) received Mass and Communion every morning in preparation of the filming. PurgatoryThe Catholic church teaches an intermediate place between heaven and hell, called PURGATORY. Purgatory is a place where souls are said to suffer and be tortured to purify them from sin. And, of course, in the past, if you suspected a relative of suffering in Purgatory? - simply buy a ticket out of there! These were called Indulgences. Almost as hilarious as the latest Catholic invention - The Automatic Confession Machine™ Mary As MediatrixThe Catholic church worships Mary as THE MOTHER OF GOD. They also believe Mary to be as much of a mediatrix between God and man, as Jesus are. A very popular Catholic prayer reads: Hail Mary Hail Mary, Full of Grace The Lord is with Thee Blessed art thou amongst women And blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus. Holy Mary, Mother of God, Pray for us sinners Now and at the hour of our death. Amen. Mel Gibson calls Mary “a tremendous co-redemptrix and mediatrix.” [2] He clearly believes that Mary is the co-redeemer and co-mediator (along with Jesus). The Bible, however, is clear that there is only “One Mediator between God and men” (1Tim.2v5) - and it ain‘t Mary. There are, of course, growing falsidity in and amongst Roman Catholic churches, including infant baptism, confession, penance, indulgences, celibacy, priests, etc. But what really gets to me, what really annoys me, are so-called Christian leaders - well-informed, highly skilled, highly educated, and well-paid - but wildly (without reservation) promoting The Passion and other such forms of error. The last-mentioned might just be the root cause “...the love of money being the root of all evil...” But I am not the only one amazed. Mel Gibson pronounced his own bit of amazement: "I've been actually amazed at the way I would say the evangelical audience has - hands down - responded to this film more than any other Christian group.” What makes it so amazing, he says, is that “the film is so Marian (the Roman Catholic worship of Mary).” [3] Ed: Do not be too amazed Mr. Gibson - both my hands are up! Gibson adds, “The way the film displays (Mary) has been kind of an eye opener for evangelicals who don't usually look at that aspect...” [3] The actor, who played 'Jesus', Jim Caviezel, said in an interview concerning Mary's omniscience role in The Passion: “I ask Mary to guide me and my career... This film is something that I believe was made by Mary for her Son. Because it was made by her, it will be attacked by the enemy.” [4] Bibliography1. The Catechism of the Catholic Church; Nr. 780, 882. 2. Zenit; 28 June 2004. http://www.zenit.org/english/visualizza.phtml?sid=49259 3. Mel, Mary and Mothers; Christianity Today™; March 2004. 4. Jim Caviezel; In An Interview. http://www.medjugorje.hr/int%20Caviezel%20ENG.htm I noticed an article in the Evening Post, entitled White Witch's Spell in Clergy Comes to an End.
The Rev Chris Horseman agreed to resign his licence to officiate at church services as an Anglican priest following a meeting on Wednesday with the Bishop of Bath and Wells, the Rt Rev Peter Price. The decision will mean that Mr Horseman will no longer be able to conduct services in any C of E church. The Evening Post revealed in December how the 53-year-old, who ordained as a priest with the Church of England in 1982, was training online with the College of Sacred Mists in California. Mr Horseman said: "I am saddened but not surprised this has happened. I have parted with the bishop amicably and he assured me of his every good wish for the future." Mr Horseman used to be in charge of Holy Trinity Church in Cleeve but was forced to give up his duties seven years ago after his wife Fiona was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis and he became her full-time carer. As a result, he set up his successful Rent-a-Rev business where he hires himself out to officiate at a number of services including weddings, funerals and christenings. Mr Horseman, who is also training to be a druid and is a Reverend in the Church of Spiritual Humanism, said despite resigning from the Church of England he would continue to build his Rent-a-Rev business. He said: "The only difference following my resignation is that I can no longer take services in Church of England churches. However, Rent-A-Rev will continue to go from strength to strength and my services will still be called upon from other faiths and many sections of the community." Mr Horseman is on the books of 20 local funeral directors and conducts about 250 services each year. He added: "I am very busy and some days have three services to officiate at. It is sad that I will no longer be able to work within the Church of England, but it was a decision that had to be made. I know that my diversification will lead to many other things and I am always busy." Once he has completed his three- year training, Mr Horseman could become a third degree white witch and high priest and lead a coven of witches. As well as holding blessings he will be able cast spells and take a ceremonial role in rituals and lead hand fasting marriages where couples can pledge to be faithful to one another for a year and a day rather than for life. A spokesman for the Diocese of Bath and Wells said: "Mr Horseman has agreed his activities as a ceremonialist were incompatible with his Anglican orders. He offered his resignation, which the bishop is minded to accept, though the bishop has offered him a period of grace to consider the matter. Mr Horseman has agreed to cease acting as an Anglican priest immediately." by John Scott (Cape Times) He now has an obligation to live as a man of the cloth, and put aside all that behaviour that got him involved in court cases of an unsavoury kind. We could have a very good reformed sinner sitting in Tuynhuys, dispensing words of Biblical wisdom. The only former government head to be a churchman was Dr D F Malan, the first prime minister when the National Party came to power in 1948. The difference is that Malan studied for many years to be a dominee, whereas Zuma became a minister of the independent charismatic churches overnight, without having to study the Ten Commandments, and that sort of stuff. So long as he now remembers that adultery is a non-no, and that he shouldn't covet his neighbour's house, and especially his neighbour's wife and his neighbour's maid-servant. His neighbour's ox and ass shouldn't be too much of a temptation. The main thing is that he has seen the light, which Paul told the Ephesians they should walk in as children of light. He also told the Ephesians in the same few verses that fornication and all impurity and covetousness should not even be named among them. But I belabour the point. By now the Rev Zuma must have realised you don't invite young women into your room, even if you are not titillated by their wearing of a skirt. Maybe we should not expect too much. Malan went on to pass laws that didn't treat everyone as children of light, and in fact made life an increasing misery for people who were darker than himself, physically speaking. His politics overrode the teachings of his religion. But reformed sinners should always be given the benefit of the doubt. Perish the thought that Zuma was merely trying to collar (so to speak) the Christian vote. No one suggested that the Rev Kenneth Meshoe's ACDP should have the monopoly. By now President Mbeki must be regretting that he didn't become a pastor himself. One of the first people to welcome Zuma to his church was Bishop Steven Zondo, founder of Rivers of Living Waters Ministries. Through Zuma, he urged the ANC to come back to the church "to cleanse it of all evil". That's just what Mbeki needs to do, but he's not going to achieve it through writing long newsletters on the internet. What Zuma, in turn, needs is a change of tune. Even at Zondo's church, the only song he could think of singing was MSHINI WAMI (itals). It's about time, now that he's an instant theologian, that he learns a proper hymn. I thought of adapting one that could incorporate his ongoing need for a machine gun. It goes like this: "Onward Christian soldiers "At the name of Zuma "Hell's foundations quiver THE BELMONT CONFESSION OF FAITHby EJ Hill & Friends, Private Bag X15, Suite 25, Hermanus, 7200 The official Doctrinal Statement of Sovereign Grace, a Reformed Charismatic Evangelical Fellowship in Southern Africa. Total Depravitya.k.a Original Sin, or Original Corruption (as opposed to Moral Neutrality)
II. SEDUCTION. "Our first parents" [7]; Adam and Eve [5]; "being the root of mankind" [7]; were seduced by the "subtilty", "temptations" [7|8|9], and "envy" [5] of Satan; "in eating the forbidden fruit" [7|8|9] (Gen. 3v12-13; 2 Cor. 11v3); whereby the guilt of this "voluntary" [10] "transgression" [3|5|10|11|16] and "disobedience" [5|13|20] incurred "everlasting" [3] "penalties of spiritual and physical death" [1|17|19] (Gen. 2v16-17; Rom. 5v21, 6v23; Ep. 2v1-3) - unless the Lord Jesus sets them free. III. IMPUTATION. "This sin was imputed" [7|8|9]; conveying to all their "posterity" [7|11|14|16], being "conceived in sin" [8|9] (Ps. 51v5), and "by nature children of wrath" [8|9] (Rom. 1v18; Ep. 2v3); an "utterly defaced" [3], "inwardly depraved" [25], "sinful" [1|25], "corrupt" [8|9|11|18|21], and "wicked" [21] nature (Job 14v4; Ps. 51v5; Jer. 17v9; Jn. 3v6; Rom. 3v9-23, 5v12-19); "altogether dead in sins and trespasses" [6|8|9|13] (Rom. 5v12-14), "wholly defiled in all the faculties and parts of soul and body" [7|8|9] (Gen. 6v5; Jer. 17v9; Mt. 15v19; Tit. 1v15), "wholly" [7|8|9], "radically" [25], "positively" [10] and "pervasively" [25]; "ruined" [5], "inclined to all evil" [7|8|9|10], "utterly indisposed, disabled, and made opposite to all good" [7|8|9] (Jn. 6v44, 15v5; Rom. 8v7-8; 1 Cor. 2v14; 2 Cor. 3v5), "estranged from God" [5]; "enemies to God" [3|25] (Rom. 3v23, 5v10; Col. 1v21), "slaves to Satan" [3|25] (Heb. 2v14-15; 2 Tim. 3v26), "servants to sin" [3|8|9|14|25] (Rom. 6v20, 7v5; Ep. 2v1-3), "the subjects of death" [8|9|13|18] (Ez. 18v19-20; Rom. 1v32, 5v12; 1 Cor. 15v21-22; Js. 1v14-15), and all other miseries, spiritual, temporal, and eternal - unless the Lord Jesus sets them free. IV. CONDEMNATION. Therefore, having "voluntarily" [10|19]; and "not by constraint" [10]; but free "choice" [10] (Gen. 6v12; Is. 53v6; Rom. 3v9-23); transgressed and fell, remaining under "just condemnation" [10|18] being "eternally lost" [5], in "eternal ruin" [10] (See, Annihilationism); "without defense or excuse" [10] (Rom. 1v20, 2v1-16, 3v19; Gal. 3v22) - unless the Lord Jesus sets them free. V. PURPOSE. "This ... God was pleased, according to His wise and holy counsel, to permit, having purposed to order it to His own glory" [7|8|9] (Rom. 11v32-33). We reject, therefore, "the Pelagians and others who deny original depravity as being sin" [2]; claiming it only as a matter of imitation [4]; and in so doing "obscure the glory of Christ's merit and benefits; arguing that man can be justified before God by his own strength and reason" [3|21]. We are, therefore, in agreement with the 1530 Augsburg Confession [2] of the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America [23] (by Philipp Melanchthon); the 1560 Scots Confession [3] (by John Knox); the 1561 Belgic Confession of the Canadian Reformed Churches [4]; the 1632 Dordrecht Confession of the Dutch Mennonite Conference, Dordrecht, Holland, April 21, 1632 [5]; the 1644 First London Baptist Confession [6]; the 1646 Westminster Assembly Confession [7]; the 1689 Second London Baptist Confession [8]; the 1742 Philadelphia Confession [9]; the 1833 New Hampshire Baptist Confession [10]; the 1858 Abstract of Principles Charter of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary [11]; the Twelfth Mennonite General Conference at Garden City, Missouri, August 24-26, 1921 [13]; the 1925/2000 Baptist Faith and Message [14|16]; Answers In Genesis [17]; Assemblies of God [19]; Campus Crusade for Christ [20]; the Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry [21]; Colorado Christian University [22]; Franklin Road Baptist Church [1]; the National Association of Evangelicals (NAE) [24]; and Sovereign Grace Ministries [25].
The Bondage of The WillJohn Calvin; Martin Luther; Walter J. Chantry Unconditional ElectionSee also Doug Ledbetter; Frank B. Beck; Herman Henco; Loraine Boettner; Got Questions; Wikipedia Limited Atonementa.k.a Particular AtonementSee also Charles Spurgeon; John Hendryx; Loraine Boettner Irresistible Gracea.k.a Effectual CallingSee also Frank Beck; George Swinnock; John Murray Second Birtha.k.a Rebirth, or ConversionJn. 3v5 Perseverance of the Saintsa.k.a Once Saved Always Saved (as opposed to Conditional Security) |