|
38 years in the making, my blogs. I have sections for movie, book, and television reviews; political commentary from a moderate perspective; Catholicism and religion; Cuban music; tech reviews; and some things I think are funny. Copyright: Many of these songs are in the public domain Wed, 23 Jul 2008 22:36:41 +0200 ![]() Hey baby. I bet those dogs are bragging to their sheltermates, "Hey, that was you?" "Yep." Some thoughts: 1. Is there a "nature?" Can it be a victim of crime? The "nature" mentioned in the law isn't the plants and animals; it's "Nature" as in God's rules for man, written in their hearts and observable in nature, that anybody can figure out for themselves. Thus, "Natural law." The argument might go something like: We see that men and animals can't reproduce so sex with an animal is "unnatural" even if it can be more fun than a barrel of monkeys. 2. Once we lose the philisophical rationale for laws, laws become, essentially, codified feelings. In the case below, the only reason one might want to make such an activity illegal is because of its "eeewwww factor." Do you think the dog complained? 3. That people feel the need to justify taking the dogs away by claiming they were "abused" is reavealing. 4. As is:
5. What does it reveal? The secularization of society. As the fumes of Christianity dry up, you'll see more of the type of logic expressed in the passage above. Aren't "individuals" people? You can say "the individual dog," but you can't call a dog an "individual." If you don't believe in a soul, then what is it that separates people and animals? Nothing. From here.
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:53:01 +0200 I've decided to combine all of my campaign thoughts in one post. Is this better? 1. "I want all of you to like me." -Barack Obama If the press liked him any more, they'd be up on his leg (Commonly known as "humping," it's the superior analogy since humping is purely instinctual, requiring no thought.). This is a revealing quote. Dennis Prager says that a man whose primary goal is to be liked is a man unworthy of respect, as people who seek to be liked are unlikely to make tough decisions. Maybe Obama's desire to be liked explains his elastic policy positions in general and his foreign policy, based entirely on the world "liking" (taking advantage of) the United States as it is, in particular. 2. It also reminds me of that Bronx Tale quote, "It's better to be feared than loved." 3. I wonder if Bush will get credit for lower oil prices. It's appropriate since the decline coincided with his lifting of the executive offshore ban. 4. According to Obama, a "surge" is needed in Afghanistan eventhough it wasn't the deciding factor in Iraq. The more Obama talks about Iraq, the dumber he sounds. 5. Chris Matthews, on Leno, said that he wants people to "think like children" for the election. This would be a disaster for McCain and all Republicans. Which kid doesn't want daddy to buy them toys every day? 6. Bobby Jindal won't be veep. I feel that it was the right choice. When somebody becomes so "hot" so quickly, he tends to burn out. This rule is a bad portent for Obama, by the way. 7. The more Obama talks, the more I think it was a good decision for him to avoid debating McCain. 8. According to my friend, this is the new McCain satire-cover on Vanity Fair:
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 07:45:09 +0200 After months of complaining about how Californian kids will have to do without textbooks because of the budget crisis, Arnold has found a way to give away yet more money. He wants to subsidize loans so that first-time buyers can buy 1000 homes. Isn't giving loans to otherwise unqualified borrowers how the mess started in the first place? ![]() I must be living much better with all of that money spent!
Wed, 23 Jul 2008 05:51:07 +0200 1. This article suggests that it's unlikely that the Obama-McCain race will be close- and that Obama will win in a landslide. Kyle-Anne Shiver in American Thinker thinks, in that inimitable American fashion, that it will be a McCain blowout. While Michael Grunwald sounds stale with his "Democratic year" droning, Shiver comes off as fresh. I think: With Bush looking brave and foresighted because of the surge and the Democrats looking foresighted as well, but to the year 2150 when we'll get around on flying cars fueled by love; a case can be made that Bush-hatred peaked sometime earlier this year. I also think that dissatisfaction with the economy works as long as it's a general thing. Once people start talking about actual solutions, conservatives win because we're right. 2. I replied to a friend's email thusly (You can guess the context): That's why I didn't understand why people were having trouble making fun of him. He's easy. You're right. McCain's not very good at it. He also boxed himself in by making a point about being a gentleman. On the other hand, what plays to partisans might not be what works with the general public. Do we want a candidate making fun of his opponent? It might be best to let the pros handle it. I will say that any normal, moderate Democrat would be 10 points ahead. 3. However, what's this? McCain up by 10 in Ohio! Closing the gap in Michigan (It's over if he wins in Michigan.). The next significant poll amongst these near-meaningless ones will be after Obama comes back from his Euro tour. 4. I'm afraid that McCain will be tempted to pull the trigger on Romney based on these heartening Michigan polls. 5. Is it true that Obama told his staff that, "There will be no brown M&Ms at the press conference? (No, it's not.)." 6. I didn't see the news, but on talk radio, Obama has obliged conservatives with some phenomenally dumb statements:
That's right. Be your own best friend! 7. McCain gaffes here. 8. Besides this interview in which Obama says that he's not sure if he'd have wanted to win the war, we get Couric's wrecking ball: What did Couric wreck? How about Obama's illusion of forthrightness? He won't say that Bush was right- a little? attached file: type: application/x-shockwave-flash size: 909 bytes here Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:45:49 +0200 Who says you can't make funny Obama jokes? Here's one I heard on the Michael Medved show: How will Obama echo Kennedy in his Berlin speech? Ich bin ein Beginner. Tue, 22 Jul 2008 22:40:32 +0200 Let me see if I understand this:
More oil won't have an impact on prices for years to come. Therefore, let's pass a law against "oil speculation." Whew! From here. Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:57:00 +0200 ![]() The "new" 2010 Camaro
From here The first car I drove was my brother's 1967 Firebird, which I crashed. My brother had a bunch of other Firebirds (I blew out the motor of a 1999.), including my favorite: a 68 red convertible that he wouldn't lend me. I later bought (and crashed two weeks later) a 94 Firebird. In short, I consider the F car/Chevrolet Camaro/Pontiac Firebird design of the late sixties superior to the Mustang of the same era and one of the best looking cars of all time (and crash-worthy). That being said, it's kind of sad that the most exciting Detroit designs of recent years are from the early and late sixties. Not only the Mustang and Challenger; but the Thunderbird and that Chrysler woody-looking PT cruiser. It reminds me of modern classical music (or classic rock or soul or a number of genres) that people only like when it sounds like old classical music. Finally, I think we're past the point of no return in car styles as they relate to fuel economy: I don't see a lot of rear-wheel drive, eight cylinder cars being sold, but who am I to argue with GM's success? ![]() The original and still the best. Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:23:04 +0200 "I'm not sure. It's a tough question. On the one hand, Iraq is much more peaceful, al Qaeda's defeated, and we have an ally in the region. On the other hand, MoveOn and my buddy Bill Ayers are very disappointed in the continuation of American hegemony. My world view would have been vindicated with a loss. Dissonance is painful. Have you ever had dissonance? It hurts." This is a fundamentally different question than "Would you have invaded Iraq?" because one can argue that the Iraq invasion has and will have good effects beyond neutralizing a near threat from WMD. The surge is nothing less than the strategy for victory. The only negative effect is that it made liberals look like fools. This reminds me of when Obama said that he would raise capital gains taxes even if they brought in less revenue. "Facts be darned! This is about principle." attached file: type: application/x-shockwave-flash size: 909 bytes here |