![]() |
| Home RSS Directory F.A.Q Suggest A Feed Try Custom Feed Sonneries Portable |
Latest Flows from this sub-category: random selection from this sub-category: |
Docudharma Sat, 17 May 2008 06:00:00 +0200 I told you not to do that What's the kanji for "Wear goggles, you idiot!"? STATS Reporting on crime leads to a crime Showing ones self on TV. just wasn't enough More crime seeking punishment I must be punished People who cook that shouldn't I'll have some mayonnaise with that vegetable blend Mommy why do they call it Dope? Because Ganja is to difficult to pronounce Naughty schoolgirls serve up 'espressos' to go at 'encounter cafes' I bet you thought there were no "new" ways to serve esspresso Sat, 17 May 2008 03:49:11 +0200 Primero...go read smackdown goodness!
Proximo: Random tube seventies centric surfology loosely to do with bass lines and blamelessly inspired by Robyn's mention of Nilsson. Could these be the absolute best bass lines evaahhh??? No. Surely not. Not even close, AAMOF, as you are about to prove in the comments! Show me up and dress me down....just don't call me Shirley! But this first vid is surely the best bass song evah!
graphic images
Sat, 17 May 2008 02:00:00 +0200 Obligatory YouTube -- The Harptones "OOH Wee Baby":
I was reading NLinStPaul's essay, Full-Blooded Americans and I read the linked article as well as the comments in the article, most of which agreed that heritage and culture and background were very important. Reminded me of an old Jewish story from A Treasury of Jewish Folklore edited by Nathan Ausubel: Usually the orthodox rabbis of Europe boasted distinguished rabbinical geneaologies, but Rabbi Yechiel of Ostrowce was an exception. He was the son of a simple baker and he inherited some of the forthright qualities of a man of the people. Last week I wrote about smashing idols. Full-blooded Americans. Aristocrats. The Rich. The Famous. I guess here I would add "The Familiar." So some of us decide to ignore all that and become sort of set in stone. It is immensely comfortable to surround ourselves with familiar things and familiar thoughts and feelings. I think that's a rather formidable idol to smash. Because although we all know the only thing you can count on in life is change, most of us don't like change, and many of us fear it. That's ok, that's understandable. What causes problems, though, is when we make The Familiar our idol and anything that challenges The Familiar becomes something to fight against and destroy. America is facing great changes. Some of them are very scary indeed. And some of the challenges we face are very new in our human history, given the level of technology and knowledge we have attained. I won't lie. I'm not some brave heroine who is not afraid of the future. I get very scared at times and downright terrified now and then. But I do believe that if we're going to solve the problems we now face, it's far more important that the thinking we support be fresh and sensible than giving a higher value to the pedigree of who is doing the thinking. It's been said here and on other blogs many times ... it's the issues, not the personalities. I am hoping that both in our political system and in our society, fresh voices come forth to be heard. I've found a few in my prowling, but I'm looking for more and more. Happy Friday to all. In honor of The Familiar I shall post an another old doo-wop tune I happen to like ... the Cookies singing "Don't Say Nothing Bad (about my baby)" (the Cookies are also known for singing backup for Ray Charles as the Raelettes, if anyone is interested). Sat, 17 May 2008 00:00:00 +0200
It always takes a few days to turn the switch. There are still teaching things to attend to over the summer, some of which will be fairly onerous, like building an evaluation instrument for one of our computer literacy classes, a mechanism by which students can test out of the course. Our students do not come from the burbs, for the most part. They are what is euphemistically now called "urban." Inner-city New Jersey. They do not generally come complete with computer skills beyond texting and MySpace/Facebook. Email is a foreign substance, except that you have to have an email address to sign up for things. I just got half of the gig to build a fair assessment instrument for $1000. And I maybe need to design a Special Topics class for fall (unless it gets canceled for lack of enrollment) . The topic is Internet Support Tools. I may be bugging the shit out of some of you because the topic is blogs, wikis, widgets, RSS feeds, etc. I suppose I'll need to learn some stuff myself so I can teach it. Maybe we can figure out a way for my students to wander around behind the scenes of Docudharma for a bit. :-) But that's the me who is a teacher. Summer is the time for working on grand ideas...my life's work, so to speak...for weaving the next layer on the tapestry. And for that I have to go... Sitting inside while outside the swamp they call the Meadowlands attempts once again to reclaim northeastern New Jersey, as it has done for millennia, I ponder the fact that I have no goddamn speakers connected to this machine. But maybe the words are more important anyway. Apologies to Harry Nilsson: I think I have to find another point of view to see me through ...over to here. Another point of view indeed. Someone has stories to tell and there are words that demand to be written. At some point in time one may realize that a discussion one is ready, willing and able to participate in is not going to take place until sometime many years in the future...probably after one is dead. That presents a problem. How does one address the future? Between here and where you are, life will no doubt change considerably. I'm told that the things I want to say will be spoken about someday, after all the other wrongs in the world are attended to...or not, which will no doubt cause catastrophic change in human society...or not. The long view smooths over many of the temporal spasms we must survive in one way or another. And the writer in me wonders about how to arrange that sort of writing, assuming I could find the space that is required to inhabit in order to produce that writing. And wonders what changes finding that space might have on the writer. One thing is sure. I am no longer confined to being the writer only between Friday and Sunday, as has been the case since Docudharma opened last Fall semester, except for a few brief respites. The realist in me wonders how in the hell I think I could package these Letters to the Future™ so that they might someday be found. Assuming, of course, that they could be written in the first place. ...as the rain still falls and the swamp continues to rise. In a large sense my commitment last year was to my past. I wonder if any of my wise friends have anything to say on the subject of writing to the future.
Fri, 16 May 2008 22:00:00 +0200
Four at Four continues with barbarisation and laissez-faire ethnic cleansing.
Fri, 16 May 2008 20:36:25 +0200 While research etc. proceeds on the Maddow Movement, I intended to do a little report on our recent progress down the slippery slope of the Bushco and Friends induced/aided slow slide of civilization back to savagery. Short for "going to hell in a handbasket" the Handbasket Digest is where I try to depress the hell out of everybody by listing as much bad news as I can find. But when I got here... I give up, says Brazilian minister who fought to save the rainforest I got depressed myself and had to seek solace in pootie escapism. Sometimes you have to just say fuck it and dance:
Fri, 16 May 2008 18:19:57 +0200 Howdy!
Welcome to the Grand Opening of the Docudharma Tradin' Post! Now open for business 24/7! Make the jump to browse products from our store.
What??? I can't hear you!
and stay tuned... there's more in store! Now do your dharmacratic duty and go shopping. Yeehaw!
Fri, 16 May 2008 15:10:18 +0200 If we were wise and brave we would have taken down this President a long time ago.
Is an earnest desire for peace a foolish delusion? George Bush thinks so...and who could know more about foolish delusions?
Mr. Bush also served up a veiled rebuke to critics like Senator Barack Obama, the Democratic presidential candidate, who suggest the Bush administration should negotiate with countries like Iran and Syria. He called such a strategy "a foolish delusion," though he did not mention Mr. Obama by name. The surprising thing is not that Bush became President. That can be explained by examining the extensive historical record of Republican cheating and election theft. Will the GOP election theft machine do it again in 2008? No, the surprising thing is that there are still Americans who remain unashamed by their support for such an obviously disgraceful fool as George W. Bush. Let's take a closer look at W's statement to the Knesset. "Some seem to believe we should negotiate with terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along," he said. First note the use of the terms 'terrorists and radicals' as if those words didn't apply equally well to himself. One man's terrorist George... Then notice the assumption that the only outcome allowable is for us to persuade the 'terrorists' that 'they have been wrong all along,' because of course we have been right and there is no such thing as compromise or a re-framing of the arguments. Leave it to a fool like George Bush to equate negotiating with persuading the opposition that they have been wrong all along. Do you really believe that attempting to make peace is a 'foolish delusion' George? Really? What would your buddy Jesus think? "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of God." If we were wise and brave we would negotiate with our enemies. We might start by asking Syria and Iran to work in cooperation with the Arab League or the UN or both to provide an all Muslim Peace Keeping force so that we could withdraw all American forces from Iraq immediately. If we were wise and brave we would dismantle/re-purpose the Military Industrial Complex to pursue peaceful solutions to the problems we all face and to save our children and the world from its ravenous evil. If we were wise and brave we would never elect another Republican President. If we were wise and brave we would act to protect the future of our children and grandchildren. If we were wise and brave we would bring the war criminals in our government to justice. If we were wise and brave we would put an end to war. If we were wise and brave...
And now a special shout out to those Democrats who have argued against the impeachment of this outrageously criminal presidency. You, in particular, are neither wise nor brave. If you don't think Bush should be impeached immediately, and I do mean ASAP, I hope you're prepared to accept your part of the responsibility for the damage he does over the next two years.
Thu, 15 May 2008 21:45:56 +0200 From an editorial by Kathleen Parker titled, appropriately enough, Getting Bubba:
"A full-blooded American." I'd like to be clever and snarky about this, but my blood is boiling just a bit too hot for that right now. So I will have to succumb to rant mode. It's about blood equity, heritage and commitment to hard-won American values. And roots. Ah...so now the picture is becoming a bit more clear, isn't it? We're also going to exclude those who came here in the last year as opposed to the last century. I wonder just what the cutoff date would be for those immigrants who are considered "full-blooded?" Sounds like according to Ms. Parker, there's some magic time in the 1900's when immigrants went from being full-blooded to what...part-blooded Americans. I wonder if that cut-off date would be in any way related to changes in immigration patterns from Northern European countries to where the "brown-skinned" people live? This all makes me so angry, I'm not even sure I can craft a sane response. So here's what Steven D had to say: So let me just say this to the dishonorable Ms. Parker: go take your racist, nasty, screwed up ideas about what real "full blooded" Americans stand for and stick them up the orifice where fecal matter exits your small minded, bigoted body. There are no "full blooded Americans" whose core values and blood sacrifice entitle them to a superior status among the many people who live and work and play and die in this country of ours. There are only one kind of Americans, and neither the color of their skin, their heritage, the number of ancestors they can count who landed on Plymouth Rock or fought in any of our innumerable wars, nor the faith they practice (or don't practice) has anything to do with their relative importance vis-a-vis each other under the law of our land. Yeah...what he said. Thu, 15 May 2008 21:13:13 +0200 ![]() While delivering an address before the Israeli parliament commemorating the 60th anniversary of Israel, President Bush said that Sen. Barack Obama and Democrats favor a policy of appeasement toward terrorists. CNN reports that Bush was comparing Obama to "other U.S. leaders back in the run-up to World War II who appeased the Nazis." The Senator whom Bush quoted verbatim was Idaho Republican William Edgar Borah:
From 1924 to 1933 [Borah] was chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Affairs, and his major interest was in foreign policy.... An advocate of disarmament and the outlawing of war, he suggested the Washington Conference of 1921-22 and promoted the Kellogg-Briand Pact; in 1939 he fought revision of the Neutrality Act. Of course Borah was far from the only 'appeasing' Republican. Indeed, prior to WWII, the Grand Old Party was home to many of the fiercest advocates of appeasement. Appeasing Republicans prior to WWII included Republican Senate leaders Robert A. Taft (nicknamed 'Mr. Republican'): [A]s a staunch isolationist, [Taft] fought against the increased military appropriations and international agreements that threatened to draw the U.S. into war. and Senator Arthur H. Vandenberg: The acknowledged but unofficial spokesman of Senate Republicans on foreign policy matters, [Vandenberg] advocated strict neutrality and a rigid arms embargo to prevent American involvement in the war. Appeasing Republicans even included future President Gerald R. Ford: While attending Yale Law School, [Ford] joined a group of students led by R. Douglas Stuart, Jr., and signed a petition to enforce the 1939 Neutrality Act. The petition was circulated nationally and was the inspiration for The America First Committee, a group determined to keep America out of World War II. Other appeasing Republicans against American intervention in WWII included prominent businessmen: [The America First Committee's] most important supporters were a core group of Republican Chicago businessmen. Chief among them was General Robert Wood, CEO of Sears, Roebuck....Other Chicago businessmen, such as meat packers Jay Hormel and Philip Swift, and William J. Grace, head of one of Chicago's largest investment firms, had never supported the president. All became key Committee members. Colonel Robert J. McCormick, owner of the Chicago Tribune, was the most influential of all. A passionate Roosevelt hater and Anglophobe, his paper became an important disseminator of AFC propaganda. as well as appeasing Republican Party supporters like Charles Lindbergh: On September 11, 1941, Charles Lindbergh appeared in Des Moines, Iowa, to speak on behalf of the isolationist America First Committee. The famous aviator criticized the groups he perceived were leading America into war for acting against the country's interests. He expressed doubt that the U.S. military would achieve victory in a war against Germany, which he said had "armies stronger than our own." Of course, let's not forget the greatest Appeasing Republican of them all: George Bush's grandfather, the late US senator Prescott Bush, was a director and shareholder of companies that profited from their involvement with the financial backers of Nazi Germany.... So the next time you hear a Republican bemoan 'appeasement', remind the historically challenged individual (or President) just whose party (and family) wrote the book on it. Fri, 16 May 2008 13:30:00 +0200 Only A Shrub Sees Appeasement
Chinese Open Wallets for Quake Aid California Supreme Court Overturns Gay Marriage Ban USA Bush warns of talks with 'radicals' Clean-air rules for national parks may be eased Asia Burma storm aid frustrations grow Afghan death squads 'acting on foreign orders' Europe Italian tolerance goes up in smoke as Gypsy camp is burnt to ground Robert George puts parasites on the map with Atlas of the Fleas Africa How one Liberian helps others speak out Zimbabwe's rulers unleash police on Anglicans Middle East Talks set on new government for Lebanon Middle East: Invisible peace talk Latin America Friction forecast at EU-Latin America summit Fri, 16 May 2008 12:00:00 +0200
Please join us inside to celebrate our various muses...
The muses are ancient. The inspirations for our stories were said to be born from them. Muses of song and dance, or poetry and prose, of comedy and tragedy, of the inward and the outward. In one version they are Calliope, Euterpe and Terpsichore, Erato and Clio, Thalia and Melpomene, Polyhymnia and Urania. It has also been traditional to name a tenth muse. Plato declared Sappho to be the tenth muse, the muse of women poets. Others have been suggested throughout the centuries. I don't have a name for one, but I do think there should be a muse for the graphical arts. And maybe there should be many more. I know you have talent. What sometimes is forgotten is that being practical is a talent. I have a paucity for that sort of talent in many situations, though it turns out that I'm a pretty darn good cook. :-) Let your talent bloom. You can share it here. Encourage others to let it bloom inside them as well. Won't you share your words or art, your sounds or visions, your thoughts scientific or philosophic, the comedy or tragedy of your days, the stories of doing and making? And be excellent to one another! Fri, 16 May 2008 08:46:01 +0200 Now with extra appeasement!
Yesterday I ran across the piece that NLinStPaul discusses in Full-Blooded Americans at Atrios and it sent me scurrying to teh Google to find some speeches by Hitler that contained "Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Furher". As it turns out it is so pervasive a theme of Nazi propaganda that searching on it is kind of hopeless, though I did run across some of Goebbels "Our Furher" speeches (birthday speeches for Hitler) that were evocative but not entirely on point. Just as well because NL's essay is much better than mine would have been and I'll Front Page it tomorrow. So I went instead with my little celebration of Republican party disarray which continues today with- Six ways the GOP can save itself
Summarized they are-
and- Hagee's apocalyptic support of Israel
Hagee's commitment to Israel, however, is itself controversial: It's rooted in the belief that the Jewish state will -- soon -- be the site of Armageddon. Indeed Troutfishing said today that he had a copy of Hagee's specially annotated Bible (free for a small "faith donation") where he lays out all his eschatology. But I want to talk about appeasement. Anyway I knew from the moment I heard Other people also remembered warnings about stones and glass houses and such-
I hate to give Chris Matthews credit for anything, but he is correct that appeasement is giving away half of Czechoslovakia. It is in fact just like paying bribes to the Barbary Pirates about which was famously said by Thomas Jefferson (or was that Charles Pinckney)- "millions for defense, not one cent for tribute". Only it was actually said by Robert Goodloe Harper and it was the perfidious French who wanted tribute. So now WE know what appeasement is, and it's certainly nothing that any full blooded patriotic American would do. Make deals with State Terrorist Iran? St. Ronnie how could you? I thought you were keeping the gates of White Heaven working for White Jesus. Huge McCain Blunder: Says Reagan Didn't Negotiate With Iran by existenz is not so much about McCain as it is a great recap of Iran Contra, pointing out how dangerous this can of worms I'm hoping it's just a disastrous year for Republicans. I hope all their crimes and perfidy are paraded before the people and they are shamed into insignificance at the ballot box. It's not because all Democrats are any better but because if the radical reactionary right is relegated to the rubbish heap of history, it will be easier to advance a progressive agenda without worrying that the country is going to go down faster than Weimar. And all Godwin bets are off. Fri, 16 May 2008 04:21:28 +0200 This Thursday's Writing in the Raw is sponsored by The Netherlands Board of Tourism and Conventions, so call them and book a trip to the Netherlands! Right now! Tell them Rusty8 sent you and don't forget to send me a postcard.
Because of the intense subject matter of tonight's WITR, it is being presented with limited commercial interruption. I'm a big fan of the Counting Crows, so I want to explain in their defense that the song you are about to hear was written ten years ago, before all the Mrs. Potters in this country began to experience the alarming cognitive/rectal conditions that are the topic of tonight's WITR . . .
We've all seen Mrs. Potters. They're everywhere. The Republican Party is filled with Mrs. Potters who still respect and admire the war criminals, traitors, psychopaths, racists, and thick-skulled idiots of the GOP who've been perpetrating fascist hackery in Washington D.C. this entire millennium. I'm not a neurologist, I'm not a proctologist either, but anyone who has paid any attention at all can verify that the GOP's Mrs. Potters are experiencing sensory and cognitive difficulties because their heads are firmly lodged up their asses. As one might expect, this condition is acutely impairing their ability to perceive and understand what's happening beyond the confines of their permanent Republican rectums. They're everywhere. You can never escape from them, Buhdy, you can only move south down the coast. This is a test of the Emergency Writing in the Raw System. The bloggers of your area, in voluntary cooperation with the FCC and other incompetent authorities, have developed this system in order to keep you informed if an Emergency Writing in the Raw becomes necessary. If this had been an actual Emergency Writing in the Raw, you would have been instructed to step away from your computer, bend over and kiss your ass goodbye. OK. Thanks. That's good to know. As I was saying, most Mrs. Potters-- This is another test of the Emergency Writing in the Raw System. The bloggers of your area, in voluntary cooperation with the FCC and other incompetent authorities, have developed this system in order to keep you informed if an Emergency Writing in the Raw becomes necessary. If this had been an actual Emergency Writing in the Raw, you would have been instructed to step away from your computer, bend over and kiss your ass goodbye.
Yes. I think we understand. Thank you. AS I WAS SAYING, most Mrs. Potters are completely oblivious to reality. I'd rather poke red hot needles in my eye for a thousand years than talk to one of them. But there are a lot of victims who might like to have a word or two with them, who'd like to know what it is about fascism and war crimes that inspires these Mrs. Potters to heap so much admiration on their Republican heroes. Like these victims, for example . . . Hey Mrs. Potter, won't you talk to me? Let's discuss what being tortured feels like . . . What is it about torturers that instills so much admiration in you, Mrs. Potters? Hey Mrs. Potter, won't you talk to me? Let's discuss what getting killed on a fifth combat tour in Iraq feels like . . . What is it about wars for oil that you find so heroic, Mrs. Potters? Hey Mrs. Potter, won't you talk to me? Let's discuss what being collateral damage feels like . . . A million men, women, and children are dead in Iraq, Mrs. Potters. Think about that the next time you sit your complicit asses down in a church pew to worship the Prince of Peace. Hey Mrs. Potter, won't you talk to me? Let's discuss what being left behind to drown feels like . . . Black people drowning, black people getting shot as looters, black people being ethnically cleansed. You no doubt pulled your heads out of your asses long enough to see God's righteous punishment of the niggers in New Orleans, huh, Mrs. Potters. Hey Mrs. Potter, won't you talk to me? Let's discuss what being a forgotten, homeless vet with no hope at all feels like . . . Give him a yellow ribbon, Mrs. Potters, that'll help. Yeah. I know, I know, you'd love to do more, but admiring war criminals, traitors, psychopaths, racists, and thick-skulled idiots is a full time job, huh, Mrs. Potters. Well, the Mrs. Potters at the RNC are even busier. There's always one last light to turn out and one last bell to ring, and the last one out of the circus has to lock up everything, or the elephants will get out and forget to remember what they said, and the ghosts of the tilt-a-whirl will linger inside of their heads, and the ferris wheel junkies will spin there forever instead. Pull your heads out of your asses and wake the fuck up, Mrs. Potters. Conservatism is an old and terrible lie. Capitalism is an old and terrible lie. The border lines drawn on maps are an old and terrible lie. Those old and terrible lies you admire so much, those old and terrible liars you have such respect for divide humanity into us against them. They incite fear of other human beings who look different, or who say goodnight to their children in a different language, or who look up at the stars from a different land. I'll be talking to you, Mrs. Potters. You'll be hearing some raw truth from me between now and Election Day. Fri, 16 May 2008 02:40:31 +0200 The more things change.....
In an increasingly complex world, many people find it difficult to cope with the stresses of day to day life. The strain of caring for a family, paying the mortgage, job insecurity, and terrorists lurking at the Dairy Queen, can result in crushing anxiety and fear. But now, from the makers of The War in Iraq™ and Katrina Neglect™ comes a breakthrough in the treatment of depression caused by incompetent and dishonest national leadership. Now there is an alternative to the endless years of suffering brought on by deficient representation. If there is a defining theme for 21st century politics, it is "Change." Every actor on the political stage has extolled its virtues. Barack Obama promises "Change you can believe in." Hillary Clinton touts her record of "35 years of change." Even George Bush stakes out this territory: "In 2000, I said, 'Vote for me, I'm an agent of change.' In 2004, I said, 'I'm not interested in change. I want to continue as President.' Every candidate has got to say 'change.' That's what the American people expect." In his own, nearly incomprehensible way, Bush admits that he wasn't interested in change even as he asserts that every candidate has to embrace it. His lack of comprehension is a hallmark of the party he leads. This is why House minority leader, John Boehner, personally developed the Republichol™ campaign and it's slogan "The Change You Deserve." The slogan was carefully composed to avoid the promise of change that you need, or change that will actually be beneficial. By focusing on change that you deserve, Republichol's™ patented time-release formula distributes any change on the basis of personalized determinations of merit. For instance:
And.....
The Republican model has conveniently defined the deserving as those who have already acquired wealth and power (thank you Ayn Rand). This is enormously helpful in the development of guidelines for dispensing benefits under the new Republican program for change. Unfortunately, the new slogan was not composed carefully enough to avoid infringing on another product that already claimed "The Change You Deserve" as its marketing mantra. Wyeth Laboratories trademarked the phrase for its Effexor XR anti-depressant medication. While this sort of conflict might ordinarily result in costly litigation, the Republican Party and the multi-national drug maker are notoriously friendly and a mutually acceptable accommodation is expected. In fact, this partnership may even expand marketing opportunities for both, as the implementation of Republican policy is likely to produce greater demand for anti-depressants like Effexor.
The pharmaceutical cocktail of Democracyn™ and Republichol™ provide a potent antidote to the travails of modern sociological distress. Taken together within a regimen that includes counseling, re-education, and aggressive doses of media punditry, a wall of delusion can be constructed that serves as a defense from the troubling realities of civic life. And as the people become less agitated by affairs of state, those who serve as our representatives benefit as well. Remember, a medicated electorate is a compliant electorate. What began 200 years ago as an experiment in Democracy has evolved into a Pharmocracy™ - an institution defined by two dominant characterizations:
The media itself plays a major role in the advancement of Pharmacratic principles. No institution in American society is as effective at mood manipulation as the media. As metaphorical opiates go, television has replaced religion in the veins of the masses. Consequently, all sides are rushing to revitalize their brand. The problem for Republicans, however, is that their brand has been severely damaged by the present administration. Even Rep. Tom Davis (R-VA), the former chair of the National Republican Congressional Committee confessed that: "The Republican brand is in the trash can. ... If we were a dog food, they would take us off the shelf." That's even worse than my own brand analysis (The Republican Scare: A Branding Nightmare) written in June of 2007, in response to Boehner's previous attempt to rehabilitate his Party's brand. The Republican Scare was how I analogized the situation to the Tylenol Scare of 1982 (another drug calamity): "After six years of a toxic administration whose policies have led to a poisoning of public discourse; with corruption infecting Capital Hill, the Justice Department, the Pentagon, and the White House; and a president whose market share is dipping into historic lows; Republicans have concluded that they need to persuade the American people that their brand of politics is safe for our families and our country." After only a year, Boehner is back with the same crippled brand but a brand new PR effort to polish his bruised political fruit. But the Republican brand is rotting in the mud. There seems to be little likelihood that the new "change" campaign will see any more success than the failed campaign it's replacing. For real change to take place, the American people need to complete a program of detoxification. They need to flush the poisons from the political system, which will require flushing some of the politicians as well. When finally cleansed of contamination we will have a chance to implement a true reform agenda. One that consists of more than the placebos prescribed by cynical Republican quacks who think that they can dictate what we each deserve. Fri, 16 May 2008 01:09:41 +0200 An action alert from Physicians for Human Rights:
We urge you to write your Senators and Representative today to support the Detainee Basic Medical Care Act of 2008. The Detainee Basic Medical Care Act would help to prevent these tragedies by requiring the government to protect the rights and well-being of asylum seekers and others held in immigration prisons throughout the United States. Dana Priest and Amy Goldstein are reporting the story at the Washington Post: The most vulnerable detainees, the physically sick and the mentally ill, are sometimes denied the proper treatment to which they are entitled by law and regulation. They are locked in a world of slow care, poor care and no care, with panic and coverups among employees watching it happen, according to a Post investigation. I once had an asylum detainee as a psychotherapy patient. I can tell you he suffered tremendously from poor health care at the center where he was held: poor access to doctors or medications; misdiagnosis; jailors who saw most ill detainees as complainers at best, or malingerers at worst -- and this patient was lucky, as he did not have a life-threatening illness. Something must be done! Support PHR's campaign and take action now. Fri, 16 May 2008 00:08:57 +0200 Rachel Maddow says:
The real issue is story selection, is editorial control. I can only control what it is that I get asked to speak about in a very blunt way. That said, the way that I handle that is that I, I am gunning to get my own show. I would really like to be hosting a show on cable television, rather than guesting because I would like to exert more control over what gets discussed, over what counts as important.
The Press, the Fourth Estate, is the gatekeeper of Truth in our country. If the Press does not report it, it effectively never happened as far as the all important reaction of the citizenry is concerned. Where the Press shines it's light, freedom follows.
This has never been better demonstrated than during the reign of George Bush. The Press has not only blinded its own light in regards to scandalous crimes, it has on far too many occasions, such as the lead up to the Iraq Occupation and domestic spying, and in the latest iteration of the military analysts, actually aided and abetted in the criminal acts and despicable propaganda activities of the Worst President Ever. The Bush Administration has corrupted both the Press and the Justice Department to such an extent that is has literally, in the case of its Torture activities, gotten away with murder. It is up to us as citizens to do what we can to stop this. To take back our government and to restore a Free Press. Just as it is our responsibility as citizens to take our government back from these aspiring despots, so is it our responsibility and duty to reclaim the Fourth Estate to our service, rather than service to the state. Free The Press! The only question is...how?!? Our "Free Press" is now a wholly owned subsidiary of a few major corporations, corporations with a vested interest in what news is presented to the public and how that 'news' is framed. In the case of NBC, for example they are owned by a major defense contractor, General Electric, which raises a serious conflict of interest concerns when it comes to unbiased reporting on anything having to do with war and defense. So a frontal assault will not be successful lol, until we have the resources to buy our Free Press back! The Maddow Movement then, is part of an incremental campaign, combined with rigorous criticism (heh!) to change the Press, to move it slowly but steadily in the right direction. The Maddow Movement represents an achievable, desirable goal on the part of the Netroots to meaningfully change the framing, spin and tone of the news by helping to get more progressive...and less conservative...voices heard in the national media conversation. Thus both flexing our power as news "consumers" and helping to move the national media away from its role as apologists and eablers of the failed policies of the right wing of America. We need to battle against the influence and framing that commercialism, sensationalism and partisanism have formed to discourage real reporting and journalism. The policies and playbook of the Conservatives have indisputably failed, and its spin and blatant influence on the news 'industry' has failed us all. The capitulation of the entire modern day media to Fox-like journalism, ethics and editorial judgment must end. We must change the paradigm, and changing the players is a part of that. Rachel Maddow being free to report from an independent progressive editorial viewpoint is one step towards that end. Free The Press! Thu, 15 May 2008 22:00:00 +0200
Four at Four continues with stories about the impact of climate change and our American history crumbling away due to neglect.
Thu, 15 May 2008 20:27:31 +0200 San Francisco Chronicle:
Gays and lesbians have a constitutional right to marry in California, the state Supreme Court said today in a historic ruling that could be repudiated by the voters in November. Today's ruling by the Republican-dominated court affects more than 100,000 same-sex couples in the state, about a quarter of whom have children, according to U.S. census figures. It came after high courts in New York, Washington and New Jersey refused to extend marriage rights to gay couples. Before today, only Massachusetts' top court has ruled in favor of permitting gays to wed. Bigots will attempt to overturn this by constitutional amendment. Even Schwarzenegger, who has twice vetoed bills legalizing gay marriage, says he will fight an initiative to ban it. Thu, 15 May 2008 06:43:48 +0200 If behavioral scientists are concerned solely with advancing their science, it seems most probably that they will serve the purposes of whatever individual or group has the power. The quote above is from U.S. psychology pioneer Carl Rogers. It is worth pondering his statement as we consider both recent developments in the fight against U.S. torture, and more general considerations about the role of psychologists, physicians, and other scientific and medical personnel in interrogations for Bush's "War on Terror." I was reading the New York Times's article on the decision by the "Convening Authority" at Guantanamo to drop all charges "without prejudice" against purported sixth 9/11 Al Qaeda hijacker Mohammed al-Qahtani, when my attention was drawn to an ad from the CIA trumpeting the announcement that they were seeking applicants for "National Clandestine Service Careers." A few clicks later, curious to see what they were offering for my own profession (not that I wish to apply), I found a number of positions open. Here's one that caught my eye: Operational Psychologist "Applied research." "Cross-cultural personality assessment." Perhaps it was the sort of job that Major John Leso, psychologist at Guantanamo in late 2002-early 2003, had applied for, only to find himself present at the 54-day interrogation of Mr. al-Qahtani, otherwise known as Detainee 063. As Philippe Sands explains in his recent must-read article at Vanity Fair, "The Green Light", Mr. al-Qahtani had the unusual luck to have his interrogation log publicly leaked, detailing the torture -- which included 15 of 18 torture techniques, then under special approval of then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld -- he underwent, in part under the participation of psychologist Leso. No one knows for sure, as the "Convening Authority" is under no statutory obligation to explain herself, but it seems likely that al-Qahtani was dropped from Bush's projected show trials of other selected detainees, projected to begin sometime next year, because the evidence on him included large amounts of material produced through torture. There is no way the government can suppress this evidence by citing state secrecy, as the interrogation log is now public record, thanks to an anonymous leaker. Portions have already been published at Time Magazine. The full log is available at Center for Constitutional Rights. Meanwhile, the Pentagon and the Bush Administration is preparing to try five other "high-profile" Guantanamo inmates at its dubious military commission hearings, as it seeks the death penalty for all five. One of the five is Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the accused "mastermind" of the 9/11 attacks, who was admittedly waterboarded by CIA torturers during his interrogation. The videotape evidence of this was destroyed, leading to a brouhaha in the press and increased Congressional scrutiny. Legal Experts Take on Bush/Cheney's Legal Team Some of that Congressional interest was displayed at hearings on May 6 before the Subcommittee on the Constitution, Civil Rights, and Civil Liberties of the House Judiciary Committee, looking at Bush Administration lawyers and the development of Administration interrogation rules over the past six years. Much of this history is already available in Philippe Sands' article cited above. Mr. Sands, a professor at University College London, was one of three prominent legal authorities to testify at the hearings (transcript courtesy of AfterDowningStreet.org): Mr Chairman, Honourable Members of the Committee, the story I uncovered is an unhappy one. It points to the early and direct involvement of those at the highest levels of government, often through their lawyers, the individuals on whom I largely focused. In June 2004, after the scandal of Abu Ghraib broke, and the August 1, 2002 Bybee Torture Memo became public, Mr Gonzalez and Mr Haynes appeared before the media to claim that the Bush Administration had not authorized such abuse. Contrary to the impression given by the Administration, repeated by Mr Haynes when he appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee in July 2006, his involvement (and that of Secretary Rumsfeld) began well before that stated in the official version. Mr. Haynes had visited Guantanamo, together with Mr Gonzales and Mr Addington, discussed interrogations, and then recommended that the U.S. military abandon its tradition of restraint. My conclusion, on the basis of interviews and documents, is that this is a story not only of crime but also of cover-up, to protect the most senior members of the Administration from the consequences of the illegality that has stained America's reputation. Also speaking at the hearing was Marjorie Cohn, President of the National Lawyers Guild, who has recently called for the firing of University of California law professor John Yoo, who is heavily implicated in giving legal cover for Bush's torture plans. Ms. Cohn spoke very precisely about the legal gyrations of Bush administration lawyers as they sought refuge from legal accountability for the deliberate breaking of torture laws both national and international. What follows is an edited version of her testimony: What does torture have in common with genocide, slavery, and wars of aggression? They are all jus cogens. Jus cogens is Latin for "higher law" or "compelling law." This means that no country can ever pass a law that allows torture. There can be no immunity from criminal liability for violation of a jus cogens prohibition. [emphasis added] Attorney David Luban, a Georgetown law professor, and the third expert to speak at the committee hearing, zeroed in on White House legal counsels' terrible twisting of the meaning of pain and suffering under torture: ...as I mentioned earlier, [John Yoo] wrenches language from a Medicare statute to explain the legal definition of torture. The Medicare statute lists severe pain as a possible symptom of a medical emergency, and Mr. Yoo flips the statute and uses the language of medical emergency to define severe pain. This was so bizarre that the OLC itself disowned his definition a few months after it became public. It is highly unusual for one OLC opinion to disown an earlier one, and it shows just how far out of the mainstream Mr. Yoo had wandered. This goes beyond the ethical limits for a legal advisor. In fact, even in the courtroom there are limits to spinning the law: ethics rules forbid advocates from making frivolous legal arguments, or failing to disclose adverse legal authority. But it would be a mistake to focus only on Mr. Yoo. Mr. Levin's replacement memo also takes liberties with the law. In particular, when the Levin Memo discusses the term "severe physical suffering" (which is part of the statutory definition of torture), it states that the suffering must "prolonged" to be severe - and that requirement simply isn't in the statute at all. Under that definition, of course, waterboarding would not be torture because people break within seconds or minutes. This is a perfect example of a legalistic definition that looks inconspicuous but in reality narrows the definition of torture dramatically. Notice that the quicker a technique breaks the interrogation subject, the less prolonged his suffering will be - so the harsher the tactic, the less likely it is to qualify as "torture." I wonder if any CIA psychologist wannabes were watching the House committee testimony on C-Span. Perhaps they will have to sign a waiver releasing the Agency from liability if they are later found prosecutable for war crimes. One never knows. Torture and Civil Society Among those who are fighting to remove psychologists from government interrogations at Guantanamo and other "war on terror" prison sites (including CIA secret torture prisons), there is some recent hope that the tide is turning in the struggle against the ossified bureaucratic apparatus of the American Psychological Association. Steven Reisner got a plurality of votes in the first round of voting for APA president. Even more, a petition to essentially remove psychologists from operational roles at national security interrogations has gained over 800 signatures thus far | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||