feeds2read
Latest Flows from this sub-category:
BookMarkerOnline

Ebook Download

Comments for The blog of Chris Thomson

Blinky Links

Hostican Review | Hostican Coupon | Hostican Coupon Code

The Cyber Juice Monkey!

Internet Marketing Review

International calling cards

Free SAP FICO,MM,SD,HR,PM,PS,PP Material

Free SAP ABAP,BASIS,APO,BW Material And Faq's

random selection from this sub-category:
eWhisper.net

Bud Calabrese - An Aspiring Internet Entrepreneur's Diary

Woolie's World

Niche Hikers Research Engine



ThinkersOnMove Blog

TechMixer

Walyou

LatinCasters Podcast

VoIP

Rss Directory > Computer > Internet > Political Tech


 
  Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:23:00 +0100
In this case (here) the RIAA must either concede defeat and pay the individual's legal fees (case "dismissed with prejudice") or go to court. We might finally get some kind of ruling.
  Wed, 21 Mar 2007 02:16:00 +0100
Microsoft, a software company, sells Windows, Microsoft Office, the Xbox, and (of all things) computer mice. Apple, a consumer electronics and hardware company, makes Macs, ipods, sells media, and plans to sell phones and computer to television hardware devices. On what fronts do these two companies compete?

Operating systems right? But wait, your operating system depends on your hardware (mostly). If you have a PC, you have Windows. If you have a Mac, you run OSX. Apple can't sell OSX to a PC owner, to them it is useless. Windows can run on a Mac, but Apple doesn't care, it already sold you the hardware (and OSX for that matter) anyway. That's how they make their money. Where's the competition? In what scenario doesn't a person stand in a OfficeMax and decide if he wants to buy Windows or OSX to install on his machine at home? There is none.

Microsoft makes software; Apple makes hardware. The only direct competition is between the ipod and the zune, and that's no competition. They only successful consumer electronic device Microsoft has ever made is the Xbox. Which Apple has no counterpart, no competitor. Microsoft Office and other Microsoft software work on a Mac. This isn't competition, this is called: cooperation.

So why the act? Why all the hype --people claiming that they are competing with the other. The answer: Microsoft sorely needs a competitor. Microsoft needs apple to be there so they don't get sued. Apple's OSX and Safari are important to Microsoft, much like Novel and Linux, in that they are things that Microsoft can point and call competitors. Without it Microsoft would cease to exist as we know it.
  Sat, 17 Mar 2007 19:26:00 +0100
I'm not being sarcastic. Viacom is freaking brilliant, and I didn't realize it until now.

The Daily Show and The Colbert Report (both of which Viacom owns) are all over YouTube. Does this hurt Viacom? After each season does it go to DVD for sales? No. Once an episode is a month old how useful is the news in that show? Useless. So what are old episodes good for. The answer is: Publicity and Advertisement.

So what is Viacom's great plan? Let them be on YouTube. There they will be using Google's bandwidth, and get all the publicity they want. It's brilliant. But why do they send take down notices and sue Google for it? That's easy: to make money.

You see content isn't taken down unless you send a take down notice, therefore, a content company who wants to keep their content on YouTube can do so merely through inaction. But wait, Viacom sends take down notices, how are there are still some of their clips YouTube? Have you ever searched for the Colbert Report on YouTube? You can still find many. Viacom sends enough notices so they appear to be protecting copyright while still leaving enough clips for publicity. All so they look like they have a reason to sue for a billion dollars. Brilliant.
  Fri, 16 Mar 2007 19:44:00 +0100
The internet scares content companies. "Internet Radio" has the word "Internet" right in it --so, logically, it must die. How can we do this? Make them pay 3 times more than radio stations to play their music over the next couple years. This will kill Internet radio as we know it. Maybe they can move to Indie or unsigned artists. I just hope it doesn't go through, everyone involved will lose. Internet radio companies won't be able to make a profit using signed music, and content companies will lose one of their sources of revenue. Good job RIAA.
The code SCO is suing IBM over is finally revealed. 320 lines, many of them comments or header files. Who cares? They didn't want to reveal the code because if it was infringing code then the Linux developers could just get ride of the offending code. But no, SCO doesn't care about it's property, it cares about getting money out of Linux Companies. And as it turns out, the whole thing is bogus anyway.
  Fri, 16 Mar 2007 17:47:00 +0100
A lot of Microsoft stuff sucks, but in a recent study Microsofts OneCare security software got dead last. It's debatable whether we should even have to pay for the software. Microsoft designs an Operating system that has security holes, and software separately to plug up the holes? It's horrible software, and it's Microsoft's fault you need it in the first place. It may delete your entire collection of emails if it detects a virus? Just don't use OneCare.
  Sun, 11 Mar 2007 09:46:00 +0100
If you want to upgrade your current PC to Windows Vista and you're not sure, I say nay!

If you're a hardware upgrading fool who just added another gig of RAM to your tricked out Millennium Falcon shaped Intel Core 2 Duo machine then why the heck do you want my advice, you know better than me if you want Vista!

But if your unsure, don't get it (for heaven sake don't get 64 bit!). Wait till you get a new PC and get Vista with it. Having Windows preinstalled only adds somewhere around $35-$50 to the final price. Much more desirable to the pretty Vista CD at Best Buy that Costs hundreds. If you like to upgrade every once in a while -- wait a while (without upgrading) and get a new PC. But if you upgrade all the time, do what you want, you know more about what you need that I do.
On February 6th the posting "Thoughts on Music" Steve Jobs' declares that: "DRMs haven’t worked, and may never work, to halt music piracy" and Apple would "Apple would embrace [DRM free music sales] in a heartbeat," if it weren't for the requirements imposed on them by the record companies.

Everyone's been blaming Apple for DRM. Countries in Europe have legislated against Itunes in certain situations, but whose fault is our broken system? Is it the record companies that don't want to move forward? The rights to much of the earth's musical art is held by corporations, not artists. This is bad -- corporations don't care as much about art as they do money.

Still, as Alex Albrecht said on Diggnation about Apple, maybe it's just a publicity stunt. Apple comes out as the good guy, fighting DRM, but at the end of the day -- whose still selling DRM music?
  Tue, 06 Feb 2007 03:55:00 +0100

Boston shuts down after LED boards are found depicting the Mooninite characters on Cartoon Network's Aqua Teen Hunger Force. (Guess who's ratings are going up now? :P). DL.TV's Robert Heron said it best when he said "What's in the water in Boston?!." What is in the water?

A substitute teacher in Connecticut faces up to 40 years for a school computer pr0n storm in a classroom. The school doesn't protect the computer (the filter software was out of date -- the school's fault), they just wanted a fail guy.

And the judges and juries of the don't understand these things, sometimes experts aren't even allowed to testify. The public doesn't understand technology and neither does the legal system.
  Mon, 05 Feb 2007 07:41:00 +0100

Listening to a 'cast the other day (MacBreak?) and someone was talking about setting up a PC for their grandmother. An "old system" with "less than a gig of ram." Someone asked if Firefox could run on such an old system. ... Um, yes? My PC just got an upgrade to a 2 gig Pentium 4 processor, and half a gig of ram. (Wish I had a gig of ram.) It runs Firefox just fine, and so does my old Pentium 2.
  Thu, 07 Dec 2006 19:47:00 +0100
Digital Photography

Or any other photography, just never really go into it.

Comics

I like books, comics never appealed to me.

Dungeons and Dragons

I'm way too lazy to play a game with actually physical objects.

Chess

Same as above.

Programming

Just barely getting into it. Only know TI basic and basic C++ :D
  Tue, 05 Dec 2006 23:49:00 +0100
Podcasters

The new internet media, it's the future. More personal, and less corporate.

Diggers

The news Gurus of the web. One of the most powerful communities on the web.

Pirates

Screw the man attitude, I love these guys. Need I say more?

Bloggers


I like all but the "online diary" bloggers (unless they're really cool :D).

Open Source Coders

Really one of the most important communities on the web. PHP, Linux, Apache, everything you need, they created.
Covered in the story: O’Reilly: iPods Are Endangering America, Bill O'Reilly says, "[...] did you ever talk to these computer geeks? I mean, can you carry on a conversation with them?"
  Mon, 20 Nov 2006 08:52:00 +0100
I have a list I continually update of the greatest quotes of all time, it's on my Wikipedia user page.
I spent a while experimenting with RSS and social bookmarking buttons. First I added some RSS buttons using Chicklet Creator Classic. I added the most common buttons, but I wanted all the buttons to be there. It looked really bad with all of them in a list, it just took up too much room. So I put the less common ones in a drop down menu. I found the code for the drop down part at the same site.

The social bookmarking buttons were harder. I found a site, Beautiful Beta. It didn't do what I wanted to do though. It had some fancy mouse over stuff. Meh. I worked off the code from a post in the blog Hackosphere. It basically said to find this part in the template (using the code in black as a reference) , and add the code in red:
<span class='post-labels'>
<b:if cond='data:post.labels'>
<data:postLabelsLabel/>
<b:loop values='data:post.labels' var='label'>
<a expr:href='data:label.url' rel='tag'>
<data:label.name/>
</a><b:if cond='data:label.isLast != "true"'>,</b:if>
</b:loop>
</b:if>

<a expr:href='"http://digg.com/submit?phase=3&amp;url=" +
data:post.url' target='_blank'>DiggIt!</a>
<a expr:href='"http://del.icio.us/post?url=" +

data:post.url + "&amp;title=" + data:post.title'
target='_blank'>Del.icio.us</a>

</span>
I changed the code added a little bit. First of all I wanted to add more bookmarking sites, so I added some code from a site called Social bookmarks.

I had code to work with, so I tried out the links. I have Digg, del.icio.us, and Yahoo accounts, so I tried their links. Only del.icio.us worked correctly. So I looked at other blogs that used the buttons, non of them used the Digg link correctly (that I could find), so I looked at some non-blog sites. At DL.TV they had a link to Digg that worked, and the only difference was a "2" instead of a "3". So I changed it, and it worked perfectly. I couldn't figure out how to fix the Yahoo MyWeb link, but I got it to pass the URL of the post, if not the title. It just used the URL as the title. Close enough :P I'll have to test the others to make sure they work right later.
I wanted to add a Slashdot link too. Luckily the site I was looking at for an example (DL.TV) had one, so I reverse engineered it to work in the blogger template. Next I got buttons for the three I thought most pertinent and useful for my blog so it would look nicer. And that's it, I just have to test the other links. Here's the code for the Digg, del.icio.us, and Slashdot buttons (put where the Hackosphere post said to put it):

<p><a expr:href='"http://digg.com/submit?phase=2&amp;url=" + data:post.url + "&amp;title=" + data:post.title' target='_blank' title='Digg'><img src='http://static.flickr.com/104/299668607_e720448af9_m.jpg' style='border:0'/></a>

<a expr:href='"http://del.icio.us/post?url=" + data:post.url + "&amp;title=" + data:post.title' target='_blank' title='del.icio.us'><img src='http://static.flickr.com/106/299668605_7be0d45d39_m.jpg' style='border:0'/></a>

<a expr:href='"http://slashdot.org/bookmark.pl?&amp;url=" + data:post.url + "&amp;title=" + data:post.title' target='_blank' title='Slashdot'><img src='http://static.flickr.com/121/299668606_9e5d48b478_m.jpg' style='border:0'/></a></p>
  Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:44:00 +0100

The Midterm Election last week was exciting; the Democrats took over. It's an interesting change, and I want to see what will happen next. It's been a while since the Democrats were in power, but I don't get the impression that the American people voted Democrat as much as they voted for change.

It didn't feel like things were going well in the US. The threat on the neutrality of the Internet was disturbing, and there was the feeling that no one in government really knew what they were doing. It's amazing how many stupid things our leaders said.

I noticed the trend toward replacing the old. Ted Stevens stood up in the Senate and said that it took too long to download the Internet after his staff sent it to him. *PAUSE* He looks and sounds like a senile old man. We don't want people from two generations back representing us, especially when they seem so out of touch with the times.

The power of the Internet was challenged. When the well connected (through the net) tech savvy younger generation saw a Republican ruled Congress try to pass laws giving big telecommunication companies control over the Internet they became perturbed. It was just one of the many things that made the Republicans look like a party of clueless, out of touch, old guys working for big business. Probably because a a lot of them are.

I've only looked at the tech angle, and there are many other reasons for this change. Politics sometimes gets out of hand. The public needs to keep a closer eye on the government. The Internet has proved to be an efficient communication medium and community builder, we should take advantage of it. We can all talk to each other and find allies in our causes more easily. No more do we get news and political advice through the filtered mediums: television, radio, and print media. We can see what real people think on the medium that anyone can use, the Internet. Anyone can give their opinion, and when that happens that opinion matters more, not how much money someone spent to get it on television.

Ask A Ninja on Net Neutrality

Rocketboom on Net Neutrality
  Fri, 10 Nov 2006 21:50:00 +0100
The Microsoft-Novell deal came up at SFN, thought I'd include what I wrote here (picture added, from Novell web site):

I think that it's an agreement to promote each other's technologies (SUSE and Windows). They have overlapping markets, but they are significantly different that a deal like this could benefit both of them. But I think the big this is trying to make the two operating systems more compatible.

There's been a lot of hate between proprietary and open source software/operating system makers. Microsoft engineers put in a memo the goals for the new software surrounding the networking in Windows Vista, one of them being "F*** with Samba" (Jeremy Allison on FLOSS Weekly episode 14). Samba being the open source networking program. Maybe this is an agreement for the proprietary side to stop "f***ing" with the open source side, and the open source side try to be more compatible and supporting of the proprietary software and operating system.

I'm not sure though. It's a somewhat nebulous agreement. I know it involves a "joint research facility". It has a lot to do with the compatibility between Microsoft word and Open Office, and being able to run virtual machines of one operating system on the other (virtual windows machine in SUSE, or visa versa).

I get the idea that Microsoft is getting something, and Novell is not getting sued for some patent infringement problem. Maybe they feel that Linux somehow copied something from windows, I'm not sure. Or possible Microsoft is trying to avoid an antitrust suit. It also feels like Microsoft might back off from the server market and let Novel market it's Linux servers (servers should be Linux anyway :D).

Anyway, it'll be cool to see how it pans out. SUSE is only one Distro, and if it sells out to Microsoft it's no big deal (I don't think). But I think it'll be a good thing.


Here's what Novell said about it at their FAQ for the deal:

Novell and Microsoft are announcing an historic bridging of the divide between open source and proprietary software. They have signed three related agreements which, taken together, will greatly enhance interoperability between Linux and Windows and give customers greater flexibility in their IT environments. Under a technical cooperation agreement, Novell and Microsoft will work together in three primary areas to deliver new solutions to customers: virtualization, web services management and document format compatibility. Under a patent cooperation agreement, Microsoft and Novell provide patent coverage for each others customers, giving customers peace of mind regarding patent issues. Finally, under a business cooperation agreement, Novell and Microsoft are committing to dedicate marketing and sales resources to promote joint solutions.
  Fri, 10 Nov 2006 07:17:00 +0100
I haven't posted in a while, been busy at school. I'll post soon, I'm planning on topics like the Midterm election and what happened with the Daily Show's videos a while ago. For now I just started a Flickr account. It mostly has my favorite wallpapers, but there are other pictures as well.
Back in the day the open sea was a governed by no one, you could get away with certain activities. It was a new free medium for transportation, communication, and warfare. Needless to say a group of people decided to exploit the nature of this medium. Pirates. Pirates harassed the ancient Greeks; later in the Roman Empire pirates actually kidnapped Julius Caesar himself, and held him for ransom. And it only got worse.

There was moral ambiguity. Francis Drake could be considered a pirate. The Spanish hated Drake, he was a pirate and a thief. To the English, he was a hero -- a "privateer." He was actually in the English military during his "privateering" activities. Piracy for a good cause?

Today's pirates deal with the same moral ambiguity. As users we deal with horrible copy write and patent law, excessive copy protection, and a world of people who cooperate with the industries that use these flawed ideas.

Windows often claims to their users that their copy of Windows is pirated. How many false positives have their been? I've had two copies of Windows crap out on me. Would I be a pirate if I cared enough about Windows to work around it? Am I a pirate to take the DRM out of itunes music so I can actually the music that I bought on my mp3 player?

If you say yes, how much further is it to go to torrent movies, or music? How easy is it to rationalize real piracy after the necessary piracy you had to go through to get the operating system you bought to actually work? What are they doing to us?!

Companies are used to controlling media. All of a sudden I can listen to the cd I bought on my computer, and on my mp3 player. SCARY! Lock up the media! RIAA saying that ripping my CDs and putting them on my mp3 player is illegal? I bet half the music stored on computers around the world is pirated. Why? Because it's so hard to get it legally, a small amount of piracy is not only acceptable it's necessary. If I break DRM, whats so different about using bit torrent to get my next album? What's so different about ripping rented movies? Then what's so different about selling those copies? It's our transformation, but you started it.

If you make a small amount of piracy necessary, piracy become acceptable. Once that happens, anyone can rationalize hardcore -- I'm stealing media and software -- piracy. What have you done to us?

The web, our "open ocean," is a place you cannot control. We will get what we want if we just try. DRM is breakable, copy protection is hackable, and product keys are crackable. They don't stop anyone but those who choose to comply.

I just installed Firefox 2. First of all, it's nice and pretty. It has more of a "vista" feel, which seems to be the popular look. It didn't update automatically, I downloaded it from here. 5 or 6 megabytes, tiny! And it installed in about three seconds. So I thought I'd have to "import" all my bookmarks and add ons. But Firefox 2 got them all automatically on the first time I opened it. Only two of my extensions weren't compatible, fasterfox and color tabs, but those are the two I don't need anymore.

I didn't notice too much of a difference. The memory usage is much better. It seems to use less memory, which is good. The tabs each have their own exit button (much like Opera I believe), and you can recover exited tabs if you want. When you open Firefox it has all the same tabs open that you have when you closed it last, it "recovers" your session from before. And my favorite, spell checker! I love this, as anyone should with my amazingly bad spelling skills.

Firefox is probably the open source project with the most impact on the normal web user. It's won awards, and has an amazing presence in the browser market. Anyone who uses the web and knows anything about tech uses Firefox, Opera, or similar browser. IE's proprietary code is too powerfully and much too tied to the Windows OS to be safe, along with other problems. And the extensions carried Linux's user manipulation attitude. The best tools for the web are all open source. Firefox, PHP and other languages. Many servers are Linux based. It's just an amazing system for users who are tech inclined.

Technology requires knowledge, knowledge requires effort, which means that those who know about technology like it a lot, and went through the effort to learn it. This offers some sense of exclusivity. I'm not just a tech enthusiast, I belong to a group, a community, and I worked hard to deserve it. Open source is just an extension of this community. Groups of programmers work together to make programs. A sense of community and contribution fuels these programs. It's an efficient and fulfilling way to look at computing. Now that we can all connect instantly through the internet our communities will only become more coherent, and more influential. No other community of like minded people can communicate as efficiently as us, because we know the technology. It's an amazing time, and our influence in the world will only grow as are community becomes even better.

Firefox Must-Have Add Ons
Adblock
Chatzilla
Foxmarks Bookmark Synchronizer
Mouse Gestures
Noscript
  Tue, 24 Oct 2006 21:54:00 +0200
The top story on Digg this week is the story of the feared demise of the TWIT network's "flagship" podcast (or netcast :D) This Week in Tech.

After TechTV died ROTSS (Revenge/Return of the Screensavers) took the Screensavers' place in our hearts. The name was changed to TWIT or This Week in Tech after Leo got a cease and desist letter. It was an exciting time. The former members of TechTV were "sticking it to the man," and so were we by listening. The excitement has faded, ROTSS is long gone, but the TWIT that took it's place has become a respectable and entertaining podcast (netcast :P).

The members seem to be slowly slipping away to their own projects. Kevin to Revision3, Patrick and Robert to DL.TV, and John to his blog and Cranky Geeks. TWIT was the last place we could get our weekly Screensavers fix. But all good things must come to an end, and if TWIT survives, I think it'll have a new crop of people.

But the new site Undo.tv is coming out. Chris and Leo are working on a site for TechTV friends can post video, pictures and text. This can be the new TectTV nostalgia hang out, and TWIT can become it's own unique piece of content. Whatever happens us TechTV enthusiasts will always be around, and will always be begging for content.
  Sun, 08 Oct 2006 04:39:00 +0200
If you want to try Linux, but can't decide which distribution to use -- start with Ubuntu. It's easy to use, most hardware works well with it right out of the box, and it's all free. If you don't want to download and burn iso images to a disk (or have no idea what that means) then you can go to the Ubuntu site and have them ship you the disks for free.
  Sun, 08 Oct 2006 03:43:00 +0200
Comedy Central has revived the series Futurama, buying at least 13 episodes for 2008 according to tvsquad.

Futurama is my favorite American cartoon. Created by Matt Groening, Futurama borrowed all the good qualities of The Simpsons, but none of the bad. The tired family sitcom format was abandoned. Like Family Guy, The Simpsons mirrors the tradition American family sitcom -- which you can see as a good, or a bad thing. To me, it was the only hang up of an amazing show.

Futurama combined these great ideas with themes from science fiction. This amazing combination brought a whole new audience, a more dedicated and less casual audience -- the scifi viewer. Prime time shows have their followings, but none like the semi-underground science fiction genre.

This is probably why the ratings suffered on the Fox network, who is used to content that appeals to casual viewers, who watch in large numbers. Futurama was meant for a smaller audience, a small content "niche".

More people may watch the show 24, but those viewers don't start communities around the show. They don't make websites, start forums, or try to find secret messages in the show (there are plenty of secret messages on Futurama).
This "niche" content is the future. There was a time when everyone who watched TV watched I Love Lucy. Today I watch shows that many people haven't even heard of. Different shows have different audiences now.

Anyway Futurama is coming back, at least for a while. And I am glad.
  Sat, 07 Oct 2006 05:40:00 +0200
Wired News recently covered Leo Laporte's TWIT podcast network in the article "Podcasting's Reluctant Evangelist" TWIT (This Week in Tech) is probably the most popular tech podcast ever created, and as a network of podcasts with a dozen other shows, TWIT is possibly to most successful group of podcasters on the net.

Leo Laporte is a radio guy (currently on KFI in Los Angelos) turned podcaster after TechTV was sold to G4. The displaced TechTV personalities went on to create amazing content. Since then all good tech media in the U.S. has been exclusively available through the Internet in the from of podcasts.

Kevin Rose and Alex Albrecht went on the create the popular Diggnatin video podcast created for the members of the site Digg.com. Patrick Norton and Robert Heron host DL.TV, and John C. Dvorak now hosts to the video podcast Cranky Geeks. And they all come back from time to time to the TWIT podcast to talk with old TechTV pal Leo Laporte.

Not only does Leo get he nostalgic fans of the long dead TechTV, but he has a focused and dedicated audience of techies. Podcasts can have audiences unlike those of content for mass media. A podcast's listeners (or viewers) is like a community, and they are more intimately involved with the actual media. Listeners participate in IRC chat rooms, forums, and frequently send email to their responsive podcast celebrities.

Each podcast community is small (compared to mass media followings), but each member is worth 10 times what a prime time show viewer. Advertising can be targeted more exactly, and tailored to each community. This media is more personal, as the listeners participate in various ways that are not possible in the large undedicated audience that a normal TV show might have.

And anyone can get involved in the creation of this new media. A guy with a computer, some cheap recording equipment, and an idea can make one. As a result there is more content to choose from, and good content becomes popular instead of the those with the most funding.

All in all, the Internet is shaping our media. Anyone with a computer and an Internet connection can influence the world through this new media: the podcast. I don't think podcasting will kill TV, but it will displace it. As the radio wasn't completely destroyed by television, our television networks have a certain type of content that podcasters just don't have.
  Fri, 06 Oct 2006 05:26:00 +0200

I'm on forums like ScienceForums.net and DebatePolitics.com, and I thought I'd like a centralized platform to interact with the web from -- a blog.

First: WADemosthenes. Demosthenes is a character from Orson Scott Card's Enders Game, which is my favorite science fiction novel. The "WA" is for "Web Alias," also the word WADemosthenes is contains the letters WAD...S referencing gaming (the movement keys for most first person shooters on the PC are the keys W, A, D, and S).

I'm a computer science major. I love Linux, but I still use Windows sometimes. I listen to all the TWIT podcasts, and I used to watch the old TechTV, before it died (bought by G4).

I like all kinds of media. I read a lot of science fiction and even fantasy; Isaac Asimov is my favorite author. I enjoy television, but I like to ride the new IPTV wave ("internet protocol television" -- video on the net). The Simpsons is an amazing show, but I miss the old Futurama. I'm into indie music -- that is -- music that my friends have never heard of.

I enjoy history and politics. I'm a regular viewer of the Daily Show and the Colbert Report. I do not fit into any political classification, sadly.

My content will be diverse and interesting. Cool websites or news stories, stuff about TV, politics, technolgy (maybe some tutorials), music, science fiction, podcasts and IPTV shows, and other things that interest me. And it should be a lot more fun than this boring intro post :P


Disclaimer|Rss Directory|Try a Feed|Suggest a Feed|F-A-Q|Partners
Links: Référencement internet | Annuaire Webmaster  | ubuntu/debian tips
Comparateur de Prix | Logos, Sonneries, Jeux Java | Sonneries pour portables | Ringtones and logos for mobile phone | Accéssoires pour téléphone portable | Sonneries Et Logos
© copyright feeds2read.net 2005-2008