I have worked with a lot of large corporations, and as a lot of others reading this might understand all too well, getting anything done always takes far longer than doing the same thing for a small business (SME)

Usually the people who hold the purse strings don't talk to the people who want the system, and there are company procedures that have to be completed before a design is signed off as ready to implement. In fact I remember an old job where the pressure really came on (from the accounts department) to get the code written and delivered. Then once we spent all hours hitting the deadline, we found out that the IT department weren't ready for the system for another 4 months, and it sat on the shelf until they were ready. Aaah well, you have to laugh (or cry).
Well very recently, I am working through another software house similar to mine, which in turn works for a very large corporation.
Because my contact isn't the major company then I can sit back and laugh at the procedure for getting this product to market. Don't get me wrong, I feel sorry for my customer because he is now going through what we have gone through before, and you can just see the frustration building up.

I am not going to name customers or reference these on my website as a customer I have provided a solution for, so there is no need for you to try and find out who it is. The fact that I have my main customer as another SME shields me from the fact that the larger corporations can recognise me.
Some large companies are fine (in case any of my repeat customers are reading this - it's not you heheh). But this project has the main paying customer (Company A), then another IT security company handles, well the security (Company B), and another large IT company handles the hosting, and server (Company C).
We - well basically we do all the work.

I wanted to just catalog the list of errors, because it may entertain some, and it may also show some, the pitfalls to avoiding these situations in future.
So this is a system that has moved servers (decided by Company B and handled by Company C) and had an upgrade to server technologies, fully rewritten by me. Obviously being way down the chain, I cant get access to the server (there are many servers, ranging from development, to testing, to final server). We get an ftp to the development server, and there are some fancy replication things going on to get it to the other servers when signed off.

So, major balls up number 1:
The system gets written, and then goes to the development server and in turn the testing server, it goes through testing and some pages aren't accessing the database correctly. Instead of Company C seeing the blatant error message on the screen (Invalid database connection string) and sorting that out, the information gets passed down to my customer who then passes the problem to me. Except I cant get access to the server to find out the database user accounts.
So I have to write a simple page with a textbox to enter a connection string, and then attempt to read a record from the database. I put that on the server, and allow Company C to enter connection strings, or set up database accounts until my test page says (Connection Successful).
Then I can take that string and add it to the system. So what should of been a case of a network admin seeing the obvious error, changing the string and fixing it in ten minutes, this took a week to finally get fixed. But fair play to them, they managed to get the problem fixed and can tell their boss that they never compromised security doing so.

Major Balls up number 2:
The system finished testing and goes live. However the paying customer (Customer A) was never told about this, and now the public can use it, but the office admin hasn't been told about new procedures or account changes, and so get locked out of this very expensive system they have just paid for and don't know why.
Looking into this a bit more we find that Company B and Company C have somehow managed to work this so that there is no one person that you can point to to say "They are responsible for this whole system". Each decision and small change has got a committee with a leader, but that gives a list of people of whom Company A has no clue of which one to contact to say why cant our admin use the system any more?

Balls up number 3:
The development server is uncompiled code because it is development and small bits always need changing and you don't want to have to compile the whole site and upload everything every time a little change is made. Now because the rest of the system is hidden from us lowly developers, then this development code is replicated up until it gets to the live server. So now the live server is running uncompiled code, which isn't really the most secure or fastest way to serve a system. By keeping the developers out of the top end, they have really invited the hackers in. Anyway that is a small thing, and as you are thinking, at the end why don't I upload the compiled code to the development server to get replicated. Well if and when this job ever finishes then I intend to :)



Balls up number 4:
This one made me laugh because this kind of sums up the whole process.
There is a new small change that needs to be made to the system. An update. A very simple update that can take the newest entered record in a certain table (about 10 fields), and send its details somewhere in a standard formatted CSV file. Nice and simple, I can write that with my eyes closed to take the record and send all fields in the file. They can then import it and use the fields they want, and ignore the ones they don't. The update would take less than a day to do and get on to the server.
Well, I just heard that there has been a committee assigned with 4 days to decide which fields they need and which they don't want exporting. This committee is more than likely 3 people, and they are going to take at least 4 working days, so instead of paying one person (me) for one days work, this update is now going to cost the customer (Company A) 4 days for paying 3 consultants, added to my day to implement it (that's 13 man days) so were talking at least 1300% markup. Now knowing that I am probably the lowest paid in the chain, I can hazard a guess that in reality it is way more than a 1300% markup.


Conclusion:
Like I say I can sit back this time and laugh, because over the last 15 years I can give many examples of how large corporations who want control over something end up over controlling it to the point where it becomes far too expensive. There ends up being too many committees all pulling in different directions, until you get a product that is nothing like what the customer ever wanted. The argument is it has been done securely and everybody got their say all through the development process, but my word, it would be nice to be able to cut through all of the red tape, sit down with the customer (actually sit down with the customer's employees who use the system), and build something that the end user wants.
Aaah well, if I could perfect that business model to keep everybody happy then I would be a rich man. Meanwhile, I am leaving the committee to sort themselves out, and get back to my immediate customer to get it done (and probably get removed again when a second committee decides it was never in the original spec).



Oh dear, this isn't so much as a rant because I am writing it with a smile on my face. I also know if this project gets to the end and my immediate customer reads this he should see the funny side.
But I am glad to get this documented. Please feel free to add your comments and similar experiences if you have any.

Cheers,

H

We've been doing small business websites, which used to be bread and butter work, especially when we were sole traders. But recently we've been making the decision to throw back some of these jobs, and give more of an advice role in the customer producing their own websites.
More often than not, the customer doesn't appreciate the work involved in doing something like set up a simple website, with contacts page, and allowing to change content on a few pages. Perhaps adding a gallery for uploading previous work.
By the time we tie down branding and logo, ease of use, navigation, and guiding the users eyes around the pages. Then building the structure and the admin side CMS, and making it SEO friendly (W3 standards, and all the Google toys set up) your looking at minimum 3 days work so over a grand and creeping up to 6K.
The customers response might be:
"Ooooph I only want a 6 page website, I was thinking more along the lines of 3 or 400 sheets?"
So is the market coming to an end for this sized customer?
We used to always take work on, and thought as long as work was coming our way then we couldn't fail.
However, this end of the market, the small business that wants an online presence, or has had a simple electronic business card type website for years and wants a little more now, is turning into a non profit minimum wage job. If another design house does manage to sell the solution at a higher price then they take the profit and pass the technical stuff to us. Either way we get squeezed to produce the mechanics. Looking to the future, it becomes hard to see how the business is going to boom. The customers are seeing more and more automatic tools for creating templated sites, and wonder why a tailoring company charges so much. They are right to feel this too, the tools out there to get yourself a web presence or online shop are now vast, and it might be better for customers to take a little time and do it themselves, or employ a student at a cheaper rate to set up the CMS packages for them.
We are now actively turning them away and giving more of an advice service to get them to use tools such as Google Apps.
We did ask, should we be developing more of a generic CMS system ourselves that allows us to quickly knock out a website for someone, but over the last 10 years I have known at least 2 other businesses that have wanted this. The theory is back 15 years ago when I was doing my Computer Science Degree, the new buzzword was Object Oriented Programming. It was this great new thing utilising Borland C++, and was the wave of the future. It was going to allow us to create objects and eventually these objects can all be pulled off of the shelf and plugged into each other making systems development easier.
Well that never really went according to plan, the way the university envisaged it, although we do write code for reuse ability, chances are when we come to reuse it, there is some new way, or new technology we have to consider and so rewrite or even recreate the object.
But like I say other companies have tried and failed at CMS systems, and when I see the successful ones (Kentico, Sharepoint, or Commonspot) then to accommodate for all of the individual things a customer might want, these have turned into a programming language in their own right that could easily have a training course purely for themselves, so have moved away from the easy off the shelf packages they first tried to be.

So where is the money now at in IT?
We are skilled, I can get a computer to do anything, so if I try and leave the minimum wage market of programming websites for other Small Businesses, then where can I go to grab the big bucks?
Creating our own products of interest to a market and getting funding.
Recently I was on a stand at the Thames Gateway Forum (ExCel centre), and competing with Gordon Brown and Ken Livingston's speeches to get my presentation across. I got loads of interest. I used to attend early morning BMI meetings and have a coffee and see how many business cards I can pass out in an hour. I hear of stories in these circles of other people in my position who secured x.x million pounds from some organisation to build something that I can do for a quarter of the price (which I have already proved by taking the audio visual system from Portcullis house, and rewriting it for a fraction of the cost for the Houses of Parliament).
How does anybody else ramp up their business to keep getting those large clients?

I see two answers, either we have to bite the bullet and employ a salesman. I know, last time I said I didn't want to go down that route, but I am now starting to see they do have a value to a team, in that they get right to the person holding the purse strings, and evaluate how much they can charge usually quite successfully. Then we can target the bigger businesses that have money to spend. Secondly we produce a product ourselves and resell it. Now that is a hard one. We have a few ideas that I have mentioned in previous blogs like the Wiimote for PC applications, and more recently we chased the idea of a Virtual Reality cricket trainer, but after research saw that we were a couple of years too late with that idea. :)

I believe we are a lot more technical than just a company that bangs out standard website templates, and we now need to consciously move away from that reputation and plant ourselves firmly in the market that can engineer full systems. We have come close to some of these dream jobs, like once I almost got to travel to Spain to kit out a posh yacht with full on automation. Once again I am wondering if we might be losing out on this slice of the cake due to underpricing ourselves which in turn undersells our skills.
I am not a cold caller, so am at present trying a bit of networking on UK forums to see what might come of it, but if any of you successful entrepreneurs out there want to give me some advice then please leave a comment.


Anyway, rant / findings over for now.

Lets try a little marketing and see what I can drum up.

Cheers for reading,

Hector.

Well I always swore by the Z800 headset back when I was thinking of writing software, tools and games for the Virtual Reality market.

However a new bad boy has just come on the scene. The VR920 from eDimensional.


Now I have always liked ED because they are reasonably priced for some pretty top end geeky gadgets. I have had the shutter glasses for years now, and although I have had to wear them upside down because I use a projector (Image coming from behind me rather than in front of me). It still made games absolutely awesome. Plus with me writing games for the Wiimote for the PC, it made it possible to have a 3D wall with wiimote inputs making for some pretty realistic emmersive environments on my PC. There were limitations however that you could only see it when looking forward. Well the Z800 for £500 fixed that, and now so does this little gadget for around £200.

It contains pretty much the same stuff as the Z800 (Head tracking, dual visual displays allowing 1024x768 displays and supporting NVidia 3D Stereo drivers) plus earphones.

I do believe on top of this however, this one has also got a microphone to allow talking out as well.

I havent used it yet myself but I do fear that it suffers from one limitation of the Z800, it is wired. I see in the contents that it describes a 6 foot USB connection for it.

Now I totally understand why you need this, mainly because the power to run the screens, headtracking, microphone, and the sound would be too much for a battery pack, and would make the head gear heavy. But I do fear that you can turn round maybe 3 times before needing to turn back again (not helpful for the obsessive compulsives amoung us).

But yeah you would eventually gorrot yoruself if you kept turning one way and didnt untwist yorself at some point.


However I am eagerly awaiting a few reviews of this hardware, because like I say the shutter glasses were awesome, and with this being half price of anything else on the market, it could be the next step that pushes the PC far beyond the reach of a console capability wise, and brings us all that one step closer to full emmersion Virtual Reality.


I will keep you posted on any more news of this here.


Cheers,


Lindsay.

Well I am seeing more and more now about how mobile devices are taking off and people are talking about how easy it is to work while on the move.

I have seen recent success stories, and other not so successfuly stories.

This is at the front of my mind at the moment because I have just finished writing a project for Windows Mobile 2003 and Windows Mobile 5 Devices.
I have always liked the Microsoft Compact Framework, right back from when I was working with Windows Mobile 2002, and leaps forward with some of the frameworks communications tools and GUI controls have made recent projects very impressive for the end users. The latest application I have written is to tie in with a Server application written by us so that it can go out in the field and gather data.
It connects to the network either by a Cradle to PC connection, or a CF card with a SIM card connected to a networks GPRS, or with WiFi hotspots.

Thinking about 2 of these 3 ways of connecting (GPRS and WiFi) I thought I would write a little something down about my experiences with working mobile a couple of years back and what are the differences now.
2 years ago I went travelling with my girlfriend. We ripped the seats out of a Landrover 110 and fitted a double bed, fridge, power points and an auxhilliary battery, so I essentially had a mobile home / office that could off road to some beautiful spots for a few days at a time.
Firstly we took it round the UK for a couple of months because there is always loads on your doorstep that you never appreciate, and back then people were getting into WiFi. A lot of houses had never even heard of encryption and WEP and WPA and it was quite easy to pull up on a roadside, link into a network and send work in and get the next assignment. Hotspots were a little more expensive in that I remember up in Glasgow I wanted to link into the BT hotspot at McDonalds. It was 10 pounds for 24 hours access which wasnt too bad, but when you moved around it was quite difficult to find parking within range of these spots. More often than not I was having to sit in cafes and public places and work which wasnt the plan, I wanted to be sitting on a beach working. I can remember one time up in the Highlands I had no WiFi hotspots nearby and had to rely on my GPRS to work with. Back then it cost £1 per MegaByte. I was working on a flash project which was a 7MB file, so cost £7 to download it, £7 to upload the new one, and I invariably then got comments from the customer to say "Oooh can you just tweak this or change this text". Simple changes, but always cost me another £7 to get the update to them. So back then GPRS was very expensive, and WiFi was too few and far between to be able to rely on it and keep customers happy that they can always get hold of you and get files to and from you.

NOW however I still have my Landy kitted out, and were thinking of heading off again. Only 4 weeks this time, but it is a little too long to leave work totally, so I will be expecting to work on the road again.
With setting up GPRS for my latest project I saw that the deals now are £1 per day (15 MB maximum content) which is fantastic because you can get GPRS coverage from the beach. I have also signed up for a new deal with BT where I allow part of my BT broadband to be used by anyone (public access) and in return when I travel around I should then have access to other peoples broadband that have made this same pledge. The scheme is young at the moment, but the final intention would obviously be to WiFi the whole of Britan so that you can get free access wherever you may be. These 2 things combined (GPRS cheaper price and BT WiFi sharing scheme) makes it extremely attractive to try and go travelling around now and carry on working. Perhaps I was a little premature in trying it out 2 years ago, but I did learn a lot, and with these 2 tools to help out next summer I think that I should be able to set up my office somewhere on a beach in the sunshine and carry on as normal.

Well I'll write more here about that as I get closer to the trip, but theoretically we wouldnt be too far away from a PC in a rucksack, a roll up keyboard, and a Z800 headset to allow you to sit down wherever you may be, pop the headset on, roll out the keyboard, and fit in a couple of hours work wherever you may be.

Well its been nearly 2 years since us 2 freelancers decided to club together and start up our IT Software Solutions company and things have progressively got better and better.

We are still working on bread and butter websites and applications, as well as moving into some technologies that personally interest us.

We should be rewriting our website soon. One thing that we had the website for was to innitially give us some web presence and give me something to test Search Engine Optimisation with. Over the time we have done loads of work and great things for other people's websites but alas we have left ours looking like a drab home made list of qualifications and customers (which hasnt been updated either).
We have also gained some very artistic flash developers who have taught us a thing or two about making a website desireable to use.
From all of this knowledge and understanding where we want to go we now have ideas to make us a super duper dedicated management server system that will take care of all of our source control, and backups, as well as project management and client feedback systems, as well as hosting a nice user friendly pretty looking website.

Being a firm fan of ASP.NET it will work in that but I have also been working alot in flash and combining flash objects into my ASP.NET environments. I am now getting rather intrigued by all of the hype that is surrounding Silverfish by Microsoft and seeing exactly what that can do. I believe a website with some of that plugged in can look very slick while being able to offer some very technical tools. I wonder what our developers will think of trying to animate using Silverlight rather than Flash but that will be a hurdle I would rather cross sooner than later. The fact that you can breakpoint Silverlight and run it as a project in a web solution in Visual Studio makes it so much easier for a solution than trying to run web service calls or flash remoting from a flash application.

Hopefully the new site should be up and running before the end of the year to give us a solid platform to impress customers with as of 2008.

Well we are growing at a good pace now, and I can see that there are some things you have to really make sure you keep a control of as a company before they get out of hand.

I guess you have to decide how large you want to get as a company and where your 5 year plan will take you.
Do you want an office with permanent employees?
Do you want to spend all your time on the golf course making the deals?
Do you want to remain a code monkey?

It started off that we, like most other small companies didn’t want to refuse any work, because why would you turn down business if it is coming in?
It then gets to the stage where you find out you are spending a good 50% of your time on the phone and in meetings procuring new work, and a lot of the remaining time project leading teams to carry out the work on jobs you have mapped out.
It then dawns on you that you are now spending less and less time doing the thing you love, using tools to solve problems. I love sitting down at a machine, and I have a language/technology to use to get a PC to do something by the end of the day. I treat it like a puzzle every day, and that is a love of my work and the reason that I can spend my working life sitting in front of a monitor. I am not a person that wants to be spending my time running an office and getting the deals.
There are some people who are brilliant at schmoozing, and I am happy to leave procurement to them. As long as we don’t get to the company situation where we have a salesman who doesn’t have a clue about the technology and undersells something that they blagged.
So now where do we go from here? We have to be careful in that me and my Business partner Dave both keep control of the work that comes in, and that we are the ones that sets up the skeleton structures, and plan and runs the teams to solve the systems. This means that we keep the control over how problems are being solved. I guess we now have to look at our company size and say we now have the opportunity to grow very quickly, and a very important part of that growth is keeping control and not letting everything spiral.

We now have a very nice bank of repeat customers, and the word of mouth reputation is spreading exponentially. That is allowing us the freedom to pick and choose the type of extra work that we go for, and we are even getting to the stage now where we may be able to think about writing some of our own products to launch out to the mass market place and see how our ideas fair. That is where I think our BIG money lies.


As one fine philosopher once said:
This time next year Rodney, we'll be millionaires.


Aaah well, back to work. I have a doozy of a problem to solve and a smile on my face.

Well the IT industry seems to have taken off recently.

I was getting right into the Virtual Reality research and where it could go when all of a sudden tons of work came in.
I have been carrying on with search engine optimisation for a customer, which I may as well mention here:
Ahem! (advert coming up.)
For all your CIM, Marketing qualifications, and Chartered Institute of Marketing courses, we offer Distance learning to get your diploma. Check out our corporate deals.

Anyway now thats out of the way, yeah I have also been having to take on employees. That is a change. All of a sudden I am trying to be my usual recluse code monkey, and now I am having to be in contact to get some others up to speed with us.

It's going great and after a few late nights and strong coffees I think we have come through it fairly unscathed.
We are still writing software applications and most of our customers are still based in the Anglia region, but we seem to be moving a lot more onto flash work now and intricate systems that uses a pretty front end.

Anyway I will try and keep a post in here about how the business is changing now. I am having to handle people, but for now I had best get back to it.

H

Hi again. A quick update to my blog now to show some of what I have been playing with since I wrote my first game to use the Wiimote and nunchuk.

It is obvious that the main intention of the Wiimote and Nunchuk is to provide the gamer with an input device that is a little more realistic than just a joypad with buttons. Part of the Wii's huge popularity at the moment is the fact that you can swing, punch and swoosh the control about and it reacts. People at the moment dont really care that the tennis game doesnt allow you to position your player on the court and tactically read what the other player is doing, as long as it hits the ball when you swing your Wiimote then that is enough for now.


So I had a play around with Wiimote and Nunchuk, and it brought back all of the memories of going to the sea front with my dad when I was a nipper and putting £2.00 (which was a fortune in them days) into the VR machines on the sea front arcades and playing a Dogfighting game with the huge Virtual Reality headsets on.
I find it a bit sad that Virtual Reality didnt take off as much in the end and fully blame the games console for this. Dont get me wrong I love the console, but it did mean that development was lost in the Arcade machine.

On another side note, whatever happened to those Sony Hologram Cowboy machines? They dissapeared off the face of the earth heheh.

Anyway I am detracting.
So I am sitting at home with my new Wiimote Game and I am wondering what can be done to make this kind of thing more immersive and more like Virtual Reality seeing as this is what is being hinted on with the Wii in the first place. I then remember that I have a projector, and some edimensional 3D shutter glasses, so I get them out to play and dust them off and I had a blast.
Now this is something I didnt expect, instead of just copying Wii games and motions, I am now probably the first person who has immersed themselves into a world stood in front of my wall (projector screen) which the shutter glasses makes look full 3D and I am boxing. I am actually seeing the boxing gloves in front of me swinging when I swing my arms. THIS IS GREAT.
And this got me excited.
Perhaps Virtual Reality could get a second wind and make a come back. So now I am thinking about all of the possibilities that a projector, 3D shutter glasses, a wiimote and a nunchuk could actually have, and how this could re crown the PC as the king of the games machines once again.

Before I go on, a brief bit about my games writing history:
I started off 20 years ago writing 2D games moving sprites around on the Commodore 64. I quickly progressed to using STOS on the Atari ST (for those of you not in the know it was a hacked about version of BASIC specifically meant for 2D games writing).
This was all schoolboy hobby stuff and never really went anywhere.
Since then I got my qualifications and got into the wide world of programming applications for business which consisted of loads of grey dialogue boxes with grey buttons that did the job but never looked very cool.
More recently most of the work has gone back to Web applications which although they still need to do the teccy stuff, now demand that they look cool, so programmers had to become designers and vice versa. It was at this time that I realised I could get back into the world of games development and away from the grey boxes. It is also true to say that it is no longer kids spending their £1.99 for a Mastertronic cassette tape down at the local newsagents, but it is a business that is big enough for people who know what they are doing to make a fair bit of money.

Well the good news is I havent forgotten my childhood dreams and I have got back into games development. I have a nice paying contract at the moment for a PC 3D game for a UK company (NDA stops me saying who) and I have had time to mess around with writing a small first game using the Wiimote and Nunchuk as inputs for my own curiosity. Check out previous Blog posts, and my fun stuff website covering it all here.




Needless to say without going down the Wiimote route too far I thought I would have a look and see what has been done specifically for the PC.

WOW - they have even better than the wiimote coming out. I have more details on my website here about my research into this, but I believe I have now taken my interest in this in a whole new direction, and instead of trying to lead a community of developers to make PC games that use Wiimotes, I want to take a closer look at the PC devices that can do far more, and then take a look at how to get ahead of the game and make the PC the ultimate Virtual Reality machine that could salute the Wii but at the same time, show up its limitations in a flash.

Anyway, I just wanted to get my thoughts down really. I need to get back on with some paid work, but the future of gaming looks really good, and I think my vote now goes back to the PC. The 360 and PS3 may have their time now, but PC is always going to be king as far as Virtual Reality fully immersive gaming is concerned.

Like I say check out my website here for a fuller explanation of the devices I have found and how these are going to shape the future of gaming.



Cheers,

L.

I have done it.

I am so proud.

To be honest anybody looking at it may think that it looks like a load of old pants, but I dont care. There was a fair bit of work involved, but I have completed my first game using a Wiimote and a Nunchuk to control it.

At the moment I havent sorted out the 3D engine license to mass release it so it is playable for people who have a license for the TV3D engine only.

I intend to let anybody have the source code who wants it and who wants to play around with it and make their own additions to it. If you do make any changes then could you please let me know either in this blog or on my website to let me know what other people want from wiimote games.

Anyway the game:
It is basically a punching game. I thought along the lines of the punching games at an arcade where you punch as hard as you can and see the results on the screen.
When you start up the game you will see a smiley face and a couple of boxing gloves and you punch using the Wiimote and the Nunchuk to cause damange to the face.


I want to take this oppurtunity to thank Terry Bailey for supplying the 3D boxing gloves as I am not very good at 3D modelling. I may colour them in at some point if this game starts to prove popular with anybody.
After a determined amount of damage has been caused then you will get a final score on how long it took you to knock Mr Happy out.
You can walk around using the Wiimote direction buttons and you can look around using the Nunchuk Joystick.
Because the Wiimote and Nunchuk are secondary controls then you can also control the game using the PC (using the mouse and cursor keys to move and look around and using the I and P buttons to punch).

It has taught me a lot, especially the intricacies that are involved with understanding the acceleration readings that comes from a controller and translating that information to an in game action.

I may take this game further and add multiple faces that you can hit, and make the images editable so that you can use your own images to punch which might make a nice little stress reliever for some people. I may leave it here and move onto a different game and try out some other types of Wiimote and Nunchuk motions. I havent decided yet.

But if you want to have a play, then please feel free to get the game from my Wiimote Games section of my fun website here:

If you want to leave any comments or ideas then please feel free to leave them on the message section of my website here: Or email me through our Main Software Development Website contacts page here:

Thanks,

L.

This is an update for where I am with writing PC Games that utilise the Wiimote and Nunchuk.

I firstly got a blank 3D world going in TrueVision3D which I have mentioned on the previous post. Once I had this world with a wiimote and my banana I realised that it is actually a difficult task to study the acceleration outputs of the wiimote and nunchuk and to translate them into motions in a 3D world.
I decided to implement the C# WiimoteLib version 1.0.1.0 from Brian Peek (thanks Brian). There is a test program that comes with his driver that displays all of the outputs of the Wiimote and Nunchuk in a nice little windows application. I have taken that test program and edited it a bit to give me some reuslts that I want to find useful and use for motion translations with my 3D games. The outputs displayed that I am interested in are straight forward float numbers showing the X,Y, and Z axis accelerations of the Wiimote and Nunchuk (-0.5 to +0.5 in strength). I figured that there would be some kind of a pattern to these outputs that would be the same for certain motions. To demonstrate what I have changed in Brians test code consider the following: Lets say you want to play a game like fishing and essentially you want to cast out the rod. Firstly you will raise the wiimote so it will rotate slowly upwards while being raised about 1 foot. Then as it is stationary the only acceleration will be gravity (9.81 metres per second squared in the vertical direction). Then as you whip it acceleration will change to downwards in the vertical and the wiimote will rotate again back to its starting position. This whole motion will show 3 patterns of accelerations, so you can then say when the player is doing a cast because the wiimote outputs will be in a similar pattern to this varying in strength.

I have written a program to try and help me to log all of these motion patterns that I need, and full details of it can be seen here on the Wiimote PC Games section of my fun stuff website.

The next phase should be incorporating these movements to my character in my 3D world and then I can give this character some tasks. Most probably breaking things and smashing stuff up to start with as the punching motion is a fairly straight forward one to get right and measure player strength.


Cheers,

L.

I have had a couple of days spare between jobs and I thought about some viral marketing for our sister website for fun and useful applications to experiment with. Partly because it is always good for a company, but also because it gives me a chance to write something funky and fun.

Games are always a passion of mine, and I have gained some skills recently with the Truevision 3D games engine, specifically to do with First Person Shooter (FPS) style gameplay. While looking around I became amazed by the breakthrough that has been made with getting the nintendo wii controls to work on a PC. There seems to be a few drivers emerging now and I have had a look at them to see what would aid me the best in a C# set of PC 3D games.

The best used wiimote driver has to be the GlovePIE set up.
I have found problems with this, in that you have to run the GlovePIE program and run a script before you can run your own program. This is too fidly for me. I then saw that somebody had embedded a wiimote driver inside a Half Life 2 mod which looked much better. They havent released their source code yet, so I have had to look elsewhere.
At the moment I am settling on one of two solutions:
1- A C++ driver that I should be able to translate to C# and embed
2- A C# driver.

I think I will go for the C# one because I believe that includes nunchuk support.

I think these drivers will be getting better and more robust. If they could attempt an auto pair setup with the wiimotes then that would be excellent but for now, you have to go through pairing the wiimote yourself before running any code. A quick hint on doing this is hold down the wiimote buttons 1+2, and add bluetooth device, then skip pairing and click finish, the wiimote should now be useable with your PC (I know some bluetooth stacks have had problems with this but I now think that these issues are fixed).

Anyway onto the game. The control is excellent, I have played around with oscillators and seen exactly what the PC reads when the wii is held in all manor of positions and moved.
I am not using the sensor bar for the main reason that I would like it if somebody could just go and buy a wiimote for around £30 and start using it on the PC. The sensor bar is only for steadying the pointer anyway so it isnt needed for the types of games I am thinking of doing.

This does lead me to think that there could be a whole new market opening up here for the PC gaming market. Nintendo have recently announced that they are selling their games development kits for around $2000, which while it is a lot cheaper than development kits for other consoles, it still isn't as cheap as Visual C# Express for the PC (its free). This means there is guaranteed to be a lot more homebrewers ready to develop games on the PC platform but using the wiimote's original input style. It also means there is a much bigger audience for the games.
While trying to find out the legalities with this and what Nintendo may try and do about it, I have come to the conlcusion that if I write a game for the PC, but it also caters for wiimote and nunchuk controlling then that should keep me legal as far as releasing any games to the masses.

I didnt want to get bogged down with the 3D graphics, and game design yet until I was sure that all pieces of the puzzle would work together. So for my first test I have so far put together a little world that you can run around, and in front of you are two objects: A wiimote, and a banana. These items were grabbed from the Google sketchup warehouse, there is no nunchuk there so that is why I chose a banana as it is a similar shape. At the moment the objects mimmick what the user is doing with the wiimote and nunchuk so I am now at a stage where I can introduce objects and physics and rules into the world to come up with some games.
My world screens:



I will keep my findings updated here and on my nintendo wii PC DOTNET section of our sister website. Next I will start to introduce some more objects, and physics and rules.

I dont want to list the ideas as I want to be the first to do them.

Cheers,

altFusion team.

We have recently registered some other domain names.
I know that this doesn’t help out with Search Engine Optimisation for our main Cambridge and Peterborough Software IT website, but it does stop anybody else buying up the domains and hurting our web presence. Each domain also has their own page ranking for the pages inside them, and although I am not actively going to promote the other domains, they might bring more traffic in just by being there and allowing indexing over time.
Domains we have now registered and a brief description about that type of domain top level extension are:
1/
http://www.altfusion.biz/ - A general online business extension and altFusion is an IT online business.
2/
http://www.altfusion.net/ - A general extension to say we are on the Internet.
3/
http://www.altfusion.org/ - A worldwide organisation domain. As long as it isn’t postfixed with the uk subdomain then there aren’t restrictions on it like it having to be a charity organisation.
4/
http://www.altfusion.eu/ - A European Union domain extension, that suggests that altFusion is a European company that offers IT solutions and applications for the whole of Europe as well as the UK.
5/
http://www.altfusion.info/ - This is for an information website, and along with this blog I believe that altFusion can always be welcome to offer advice to somebody as well as to provide a full IT system or software application.

We dont see any need to register any other domain names at the moment.
Just as a side note, I have already mentioned that we have got a fun website filled with Games and Gadgets and Widgets and things to experiment with here.

It was brought to my attention recently that Google Apps had re-branded and are now trying out different tools to help people with their web presence.
We wanted to register a new domain to have a play around with this, so I joined up and registered a test domain here:
Cambridge and Peterborough software developers test partner website.

So I signed up at the Google Apps pages, and registered the domain.

From the front menu there is a bit of confusion with 2 categories of pages to sort out. There is a link to sort out the start pages, and there is a link to sort out the web pages.

I didn’t know the difference, so I thought I would sort out the start pages seeing as it makes sense to start at the start.
What happened then was I sorted out the content, and put on a couple of blogs, a weather report, and a calendar.
I then waited to see this start page turn up at the http://www.altfuzion.com and after about a week, it still never turned up. It always stayed at start.altfuzion.com
So I went back and re visited the account and saw that the webpages were still blank even though the start page was set up. I then set up the webpages which at the moment is a title and a piece of text just introducing what I am trying to do with the Google Apps account.
That now does come up at the intended application URL.
Because I now have an ASP.NET (dot net) website that I don’t want to break so I will leave that alone, and I can now use www.altfuzion.com as a blank canvas to try out any number of tools and technologies.

I have found so far that Google states they do not give any preferential treatment to pages or websites that are held and created on Google Page Creator.
It just has the same precedence as any other website on the internet.

It should be worth mentioning: We have registered our test domain http://www.altfuzion.com to run through googlepages, although with my googlepages account I can actually register 4 domains in total to have other domains to experiment with. These domains are all within the http://########.googlepages.com area however so I don’t really see a need to explore this further, I will be sticking with http://www.altfuzion.com which points to http://www.altfuzion.com-a.googlepages.com/ only for my experiments.




I am now looking into Google Gadgets and Widgets to see what it is about, and there seems to be a wealth of Widgets that have been written for google pages.
Some of these are free and some are costly, but all are supposedly easy to install through my main Google Page Creator.
I am going to have a test page to hold gadgets and widgets that I will make public.
You can view my google widgets test page here.

Questions I have to be answered are:
Can I make a robots.txt and sitemap.XML ?
It does state there is 100MB of storage space. Can I upload pages directly to my space, or do I have to go through their interface.
If I can upload pages, can I upload aspx (ASP.NET) pages, or is there any kind of server side technology that I can utilize?
Is there any database technology that I can utilize on their storage space?

I don’t want this post to be a rant, because it is a serious question that I want to explore and invite comments on, to really try and find an answer to this problem.

The main underlying question is:
Why should we have to charge £1000+ a day to get the big contracts?
It's not a bad thing I guess if you can keep getting those contracts, but consider the following scenario:
Buying a car.
When buying a car you don’t go for the cheapest because you perhaps want a little bit of luxury (say an air bag and an alarm).
You wouldn’t buy the most expensive car because you know that in this industry you can sometimes pay a lot for essentially the badge on the bonnet.
So you would read reviews, and take test drives and weigh it up and try and find something in the middle that offers good value for money.


So there is a massive difference between the car (and other) industry and the software industry that I would like to try and highlight.

After spending my time in the saddle getting experience working on some very large projects I can confidently say that I know what I am doing.
Some of my systems are now being used in the front line of today's technology, and I am proud to be able to point out different solutions and say "I did that". What’s more, I did it correctly, and it is still useful many years later.
As well as the bespoke software solutions that I have provided with my company, I had written many huge systems while working for other companies.
I wrote the system that automates Sunblest bakeries, so all bread including Kingsmill is made on my SCADA system. Its the same for Quavers crisps, and a lot of Britain’s pasta.
I wrote simulators and emulator device drivers for Hitachi smart cards and micro controllers, so I can say that today's state of technology with the microchip and smart card systems is partly (maybe even largely) thanks to tools that I generated.
I have also had input to the Ministry of Defence and know that systems I wrote for them are still being used today to help defend our country (Details are bound by the official secrets act).
And I wrote some of the tools for the initial Tandem systems that were the building blocks for online banking.


So now that I own my own business, why do I face problems when trying to sell my skills to a large company for a cheaper price than other software houses that have half of our experience?
This is an interesting question at the moment, and I think it can have a lot to do with the first impression given merely by the quote.
When a small business like mine tries to approach a customer to let them know that we are the best people to provide their software system, then we can always hit a problem because we are competing with professional sales staff from other companies. I know that when trying to sell something then, a sales professional is going to be better than a software engineer, but is that really what the customer wants? Problems that can arise from this is that the software engineers cannot actually provide half of the ‘blag’ that a sales person has said to get the job, and this is where projects fall down (NHS and Passport office are prime examples).
So on top of a sales professional knowing to say exactly what the customer wants to hear, what else could be tipping the scales away from small businesses on getting these contracts?
I know that larger software provider companies have many expenses including the following: employing a sales team, an accountant, a secretary, the director probably doesn’t know too much about computers but will take his wage, and the office rental. This will all have to come out of an invoice for work. The actual percentage of software engineers that will be doing the useful work that the customer is paying for probably makes up only 50% of the company expenses.
After looking at some of these larger jobs that have gone wrong like the NHS system, and the Passport office I can see clearly what went wrong, and where the inexperience was. I can probably take a guess that it was a very good sales person / consultant that sold the system to the customer while the actual experience of the programmers / team just couldn’t match the blag. The result of this is there is a system that has cost millions, but is of no use to anyone, and it will end up costing double to rewrite it to a state that it can be used.
Its not just these high profile jobs however, I see it everywhere in the current climate. A leading motor breakdown recovery company has just changed their computer system to automate everything and it isn't working. The offices are still working on paper 2 months after the system was supposed to be commissioned because once going live, the software providers realise that all of the current smaller systems just cannot talk to each other. So in reality - these solutions have sent the business 2 steps backwards.

So to highlight the problem again:
When I am in competition with a sales person giving it the spiel about what his team can do and why he is charging £1200 per day, how can I convince the customer that the reason I am charging under half of that is because I want his money to be spent on the solution, and not the running of all areas of my business.
How can I get the customer over the first impression of us being a small two bit software house, and gain confidence that we have a fantastic customer satisfaction rate?
Finally how can I convince him that this job isn't beyond our capabilities?

Do I just double my prices? I know that when approaching big companies in the past that we have been ignored purely on the quote. One of our quotes was a quarter of another company and I received a phone call telling me that I may not appreciate just how big the system was. The truth was I knew what was involved perhaps more than the sales person that sold them the solution.
Without naming names that was for a London borough community website, and a year and a half later, I still haven’t seen the finished product live. I confidently said I would have it finished mid 2006 if I was to do it.
Another large chocolate manufacturer rejected a quote purely because we didn’t have a permanent office and overheads like the accountants, sales staff, and all of the other things that cost money but don’t produce useful systems or end products.
We always lose out on government solutions, even though we have successfully produced these solutions in the past while working through other companies.

I guess half of this business is actually blag. If you can learn to give a customer a bit of flannel and make out that you are selling a prestige badge (back to the cars analogy) then you will have more chance of landing the work. So double your prices for no reason and all of a sudden the customer thinks "They must be good". It seems to speak volumes over actual reputation and previous work.

I'm not too sure about how to get this perception of badge prestige. Can it be done with image, and a nice website? I think that makes a good first impression, but ultimately you are going to need a bit of the expertise in schmoozing to be able to win over the customer and land that contract.

It perhaps goes to show that the age of getting out there and networking isn’t dead yet, and face to face will always take you higher than online marketing.

I have put down some interesting thoughts here, and I have raised some questions in my own mind while writing this. I will come back to this topic, later on. For now I want to keep trying with the online marketing question and see where I can take us before I jump into the sales world of ‘blagging’.

Please feel free to comment on anything you have read in this blog.

While trying to learn something about Search Engine Optimisation, I had a customer that wanted their website promoting.
This was great as it gave me the opportunity to hone my skills while earning a little bit of money from it. This opportunity would hopefully allow me to get some experience and reputation to say that our company can now offer successful search engine optimisation and a solid online marketing plan for other small businesses that want to raise their web presence.

My task:
The main search engines to optimise for were the main 3 for the UK and .COM so that was:
www.google.com
www.google.co.uk
www.yahoo.com
www.yaho.co.uk
www.msn.com
www.msn.co.uk

and I was optimising mainly for the following 3 search terms:
CIM, CMI, ISMM
With a view to secondary optimisation for the following search terms:
marketing course, Marketing qualification, Marketing course London, CIM Course, CIM London, and CIM qualification


I think I have come into this at the right time because things are changing, especially with Google. They have released a lot more tools recently to help people like me to monitor, test and plan my Search Engine Optimisation strategy. These tools are Webmasters tools including sitemaps, and Google Analytics.
Last year they changed the way that they were going to index the internet. It was becoming more apparent that they weren’t going to be able to hold everything public that is on the net, so they had to think about dropping old content, and keeping the useful stuff. This was the ‘BIG DADDY’ update and it showed a way forward that they are aiming to stop tricksters from pushing their search results to the top using lazy methods.
More recently (well currently) from January to March 2007 they are making more updates to their search spiders and they are totally changing the way in which it works. There is a lot of speculation now about the way in which this will work, and people are keeping an eye on what Matt Cutts has got to say on the issue, but it looks like it will be another step to stop quick fix methods and to reward people who have put in the legwork.

Anyway, Since the start of the year and trying this out, I have been keeping records of search positions for certain words for my customer’s company, and I am proud to say that I have jumped him in the search results from around 150th in the list now up to 7th so they are now on the first page.
I am proud of my efforts because it means that I was working on the right tracks, and I believe that I know what to do as well as what to steer clear of in future.
I will now be advertising that we can help with Search Engine Optimisation as one of our skills on our company website.

Regards,

Hector.

I thought I would write a little something about my marketing findings and the way that standard search engine optimisation (SEO) seems to be pulling solutions away from geographic locations. This is also generating new problems for customers who are looking for a bespoke I.T. solutions provider and would prefer to find one near to them.

altFusion is based in Anglia (offices in Cambridge and Peterborough). I would say that only about twenty five percent of our customers are actually based in the Anglia region however. Currently there's the Cambridge Professional Academy based in Cambridge, The Edge Agency based in Elseworth, BEA building and clay products based in Huntingdon, and St Edmundsbury and Uttlesford Councils.

This doesn’t usually produce a problem in that we can work remotely, and would only need to meet the customer once to gain their trust and then we can be left to work and communicate through the internet to build their bespoke applications.

Some solutions do require more travelling. We have had to travel to places like Westminster and to the Welsh National Assembly a lot more for researching and systems implementation.

As I have said earlier, some customers might want to find a solutions provider that lives close to them as it gives them a piece of mind that they can visit any time and keep more of an eye on their solution/application to aid them with their project control. But with the communications revolution at the stage where it is now, it allows the same trust and control to be built up no matter how far apart the solutions providers and customers may be.

One main example of the way this may be hurting customers finding providers is; recently I received a request from a company in Leeds who used an American website to find a UK software application programmer. The website was taking bids in dollars only - so was meant for USA contracts to be advertised and found.
The truth is that their solution was a simple back office product using Coldfusion and MySQL, and chances are there would probably be a solutions provider that could of done it for them that are based within 2 or 3 miles of their offices.
It seems a shame that they now have to pay this USA company royalties and go through their Escrow payments system, and lose more money to try and find their solutions provider, when they are probably working to a set budget for the whole software application anyway.

One very good way that I like of getting around this problem is the Google Maps directory, and the Microsoft Local directories of companies. I believe that this will revolutionise the way that customers can find people to provide applications, programs or anything really. I would like to see more of gmaps and MS Local being used in other areas of the web say in things like ebay bids, so that you can know how far away something is from you visually and instantly, to see if you would rather collect it yourself, than pay the delivery charge.
I think that wanted ads and requests would also benefit from these mapping services greatly so that you can request something and specify a radius from a central point of where you would like that request answered. This would make the sourcing of solutions providers vastly more efficient for the company with the problem, and then the money spent on a solution could be spent more on its development rather on the advertising and procurement process.

I do have a lot of experience with writing Google gmaps solutions, and I guess I could easily write something to be used with that to answer this problem, but I am dubious at the moment until the great war of who will come out on top has been answered: Google maps or Microsoft Local.

Just as a footnote, I think that Yahoo have lost out on this war. I have seen their local directories, and I tried to get my company listed with them, but they say that their directory listings for the UK are taken from the BT phone book listings. When exploring this further and seeing if I could get us listed with BT so that in turn we could then get listed on Yahoo local directories, I found out that it costs over £300 per year to do this. For this reason I think Yahoo will only ever have a local directory of large businesses with a large marketing budget.
Google’s free way of sending you a PIN number to your location to prove that you are where you say you are will allow them to stay secure, not get full of spam companies and will allow them to keep a FAR more substantial listing of all businesses.
Microsoft take their UK local listings from Thomson Local which allows a free listing so they will also keep secure and allow smaller businesses with low marketing budgets to keep local listings on there.

So my conclusion is there may be an area where bespoke systems can still solve local searching of different things, adding to the functionality of Google maps and/or Microsoft Local. Hopefully I can start to identify some of these and see if I can be one of the providers of these systems. I think for a company's potential customers trying to procure services, then steering them away from a normal search engine and results towards this geographic search could be a benefit to them as well.

I have been hearing a lot of buzzwords lately about ROR sitemaps.
I want to write a little something here about my findings with it.

I thought I was well up with promoting websites by having a normal XML sitemap, and submitting it to Google webmaster tools, and Yahoo sitemaps, and then the search engines would know all about it and that would be it.

I tend to keep sitemaps simple with a list of pages in the site, and usually I keep all priorities at 0.5.
an example of one of these sitemaps is here:
altFusion software website sitemap
Although I have also spent a little more time over sitemaps and given each page a different priority and painstakingly gone through it by hand to try and optimise it.
An example of one of these sitemaps is here:
marketing course sitemap

Recently however I have been hearing that the sitemaps I have got are now old hat, and I want to be looking at ROR (Resources of a Resource) Format.
In short - ROR should be a form of sitemap that can tell search engines a lot more than just what pages are in a site. It should also now be able to tell search engines about the following as well:
sitemaps, products, services, menus, images, reviews, contact info, business and info.

This is a first blog to list that I know about this, I will add to this as I actually have a play around with ROR, but for now a good generator of ROR is here:
http://www.rorweb.com/rormap.htm

and the root: http://www.rorweb.com/ seems to have a lot of explanations about ROR.
I think the first experiment for me is to generate ROR of the two sitemaps I have mentioned above and then call them ror.xml so that I can also keep the normal sitemap.xml that I already have. I will then start to submit these ROR pages to google webmaster tools and yahoo sitemaps instead of the normal sitemaps.xml page, and see if that helps or harms my website SEO.

I will use this post to log all information about this that I see fit.

Cheers,

Lindsay.

Director and Systems Architect - altFusion Ltd.

altFusion are pleased to announce bringing on board the graphical skills of Dave Rendle to help with the styling and graphics of phase 2 of a 3D Game for the PC.

The game is a new area of development for altfusion, and phase 1 was accepted back in November which proved to be a successful transition from current applications that altfusion have tackled.

We look forward to what the team can present for the next phase, and hopefully we can continue to provide this kind of solution with a view to move into the Console market as well as PC.

I have spent a week trying to see if I can write a nifty little DotNet site to help test out some of the SEO things I am doing.

One thing that I found out that was taking ages was to see where a web site is coming in the search results.

To give an example, Google analytics gives a wealth of information, and lets you know where people are coming to your site from, and all manner of things you can analyse. Also the Google webmaster tools are a fantastic wealth of information about how the bots are analysing the site, and what is right and wrong.
Of course this isn't what the customer cares about though. What the customer wants to know is when I type in "XXX" where does my site come up in the results? and when will it be in the top 10? This took a while to test.
I have already mentioned that one customer was http://www.professionalacademy.com and they wanted to be coming higher in the searches for CIM, CIM course, and marketing course so that they dont have to rely on Adwords.


Now to test this, they want to also know where they come in www.google.com, www.google.co.uk, www.yahoo.com, www.yahoo.co.uk, www.msn.com, and www.msn.co.uk

So to perform one test I would go into www.google.com type in CIM, get the results, and then do a search on "professionalacademy" to see how far down the list the website is mentioned. I then do it for the other 5 search engines, and then I have to go through all search engines again for the other 2 search phrases. That is 18 full searches and positions to find just to test 3 search phrases.
This just takes up far too much time, and most time is then spent on testing than on actual SEO. This is then made worse when there are 10 search phrases to test for all 6 search engine URLs.
So I went away and started a nice little ASP.NET project to do it automatically for me.
Here is a list of the problems and why no body else should really bother doing the same.

Google JAVA Search API
Firstly to mention the Google JAVA Search API. This is the replacement of the old Google SOAP API. Now if you could use the old SOAP API then you could do a search, get 100 results in as XML and search through them for your position. The trouble is however if you didnt get an API Key before December 2006 then you cannot get one now and are tied in to using the JAVA API. The JAVA API doesnt allow a return of 100 results to be read by your program. It shows 8 results that are displayed inside their own JAVA viewer plugin. I dont know if Google are trying to stop SEO people just running searches to test the position of their website but I cannot now find a way to do it, outside of the original manual way.

Yahoo search API.
There are 2 ways to search using the Yahoo way. A plug in SDK, or a webservice (WSDL). Neither way gives accurate results. After putting the search terms in, and playing around with settings and flags I just cannot get CIM to show professionalacademy in the same place as if I go onto www.yahoo.com and www.yahoo.co.uk and perform the same test manually.

msn Seach API
Microsoft have got a plug in SDK run by Microsoft Live which is similar to the Yahoo one. It also has the same problems. I have managed to match the results up on one www.msn.com world search. But I have also found that a world search on www.msn.com shows different results to a world search on www.msn.co.uk, the same as a uk search on www.msn.com will show a different list to a uk search on www.msn.co.uk

After looking into all of these problems a little bit more I was put in touch with somebody who had done testing of their own, and they came up with similar results to me. Their posting of the search results is here.

Now after it took me a day to write the testing web site but another 4 days to try and hone in the search results to what a search engine actually shows an average user, I am afraid that I have to come to the conclusion that these searching APIs arent really worth playing with. A customer will not believe your testing if what you say doesnt match what they will see when they go onto the website and type in a search term and check the position themselves. They will then rubbish all of the rest of the testing that these APIs bring up.

I now believe that perhaps if I can, I should try and enter the website search engines themselves. Perform the POST that a Submit button would do, and then parse the HTML that is returned. This would then match totally what a customer would see when they double check my testing.
I will keep a record on here if I can write such a test environment becaues I believe that this could become useful to others, and might be a software tool worth putting up on our website.

L.

Well I thought I knew a fair bit about SEO, and I am on a mission at a minute to see what I can do for these Marketing course trainers, and of course my own software company.
I signed up to Google analytics, and webmasters tools and google base, and all other things I could think of to help me out, and I have now started to take a look at what Yahoo has to offer.
It is pretty fantastic with its API. I am at present using it to write a testing tool for me where I can enter a search string and then go through the results to see what position the website I am interested in comes up at.
I did see ready made tools to do this, but they tend to only go up to the first 50 results which isnt very good when you are starting out for a company and their results start at 350+.
Anyway I will try and figure out what Yahoo has got to offer, and how it compares to Google tools, and finally I want to see what msn has to bring to the SEO table.

I will write up my thoughts here as I get them.

Hi there, I have just signed up for this and I am not sure what to write here so I will just introduce meself.

I am co founder of a UK software house. At the moment I am upgrading a web site and application for a CIM ISMM and CMI training company. I wont run on too long about that. Other jobs and interests I have are writing 3D games. I have come up through the ranks of poking pixels and writing games for the C64 and have recently completed a nice 3D far cry style game on the PC using the TV3D engine. I am looking forward to getting to grips wth the XNA and seeing what I can write cross platform for the 360 and PC.
Although I am also very excited about the new Wii, my GF keeps running around saying I want a Wii. I think there is a lot of scope for them allowing homebrew flash games to be written for it and I wouldnt mind seeing a conversion of the Yeti Sports put on there, but I guess that will come with time.

Anyway that is my first post.
This is me.
I will speak more in future and find out a lot more about what this blogging is but for now,

have a nice 2007 :)

Lindsay.